The Scouring of the White Horse; Or, The Long Vacation Ramble of a London ClerkHughes, Thomas
General
The Scouring of the White Horse; Or, The Long Vacation Ramble of a London Clerk
Hughes, Thomas
White Horse, Vale of (England)
Aston has a stronger case. It is situate between Wallingford and
Ilsley. The range of chalk hills rises just above it, and one detached
hill is here thrown out into the vale, on which are still visible
considerable earthworks. There is a chapel called Thorn Chapel on the
eastern slope of this hill, and I am told there is a tradition that
this chapel was built on the spot where some Saxon king heard mass on
the morning of a battle. It is suggested by Mr. Lousley and others,
that the Saxons occupied this outlying hill, the Danes the opposite
range; and that the battle was fought in the valley between, where,
when the road was recently altered, a number of bones were found,
apparently thrown in together without care, as would be the case after
a battle. There are, however, no regular barrows or other remains.
Bishop Gibson is in favour of this spot, on account, as it would seem,
of a passage in the Saxon Chronicle for the year 1006, which runs as
follows: “They” (the Danes) “destroyed Wallingford, and passed a night
at Cholsey.” Then they “turned _along Ashdown_ to Cwichelmes Low.”
The bishop says, that Cwichelmes Low (the _low_ or hill of King
Cwichelm, who reigned in these parts, and died in the year 636 A.D.)
is Cuckhamsley Hill, or Scuchamore Knob, as it is generally called;
a high hill in the same chalk range, about ten miles east of White
Horse Hill; and he argues that, as the Danes went _from_ Wallingford,
_by_ Ashdown, _to_ Cwichelmes Low, we must look for Ashdown between
Wallingford and Cuckhamsley Hill. Now Aston lies directly between the
two, therefore Aston is Ashdown, and the site of the battle. But the
place now called Ashdown is on the further side of Cuckhamsley Hill
from Wallingford--therefore the Danes could not have passed it in
getting from Wallingford to Cuckhamsley Hill--therefore the modern
Ashdown cannot be the site of the battle.
To this I answer, _First_, the Bishop _assumes_ that Cwichelmes Low is
Cuckhamsley Hill, without giving any reason.
_Secondly_, assuming Cwichelmes Low and Cuckhamsley Hill to be
identical; yet, as Ashdown was clearly a large tract of country, the
Danes might go from Wallingford, _along_ a part of it, _to_ Cwichelmes
Low without passing the battle-field.
_Thirdly_, the name Aston is written “Estone” in Domesday Book; meaning
“East town,” or enclosure, and not “Mons fraxini,” the “Hill of the
Ash-tree.”
_Fourthly_, Æthelred and Alfred would have kept to the hills in their
retreat, and never have allowed the Danes to push them out into the
Thames-valley, where the Pagan cavalry would have been invaluable; but
this must have been the case, if we suppose Aston to be the site of
the battle. Lastly, all the above sites are too near to Reading, the
farthest being only sixteen miles from that town. But Æthelred and
Alfred had been retreating three days, and would therefore much more
probably be found at Ashdown by White Horse Hill, which is ten miles
farther along the range of hills.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account