The Second Boys' Book of Model AeroplanesCollins, Francis A. (Francis Arnold)
Science
The Second Boys' Book of Model Aeroplanes
Collins, Francis A. (Francis Arnold)
Airplanes -- Models
There is an immense difference of opinion again as regards skin
friction. Some writers believe the air has a tendency to stick to
certain materials more than to others, and that this difference is so
great as to materially retard some machines in their passage through the
air. A complicate series of tables has been worked out in great detail
to show the exact amount of this friction on various bodies. Some
aviators go to great pains to make every part of their aeroplanes as
slippery as possible. This is done by polishing the surfaces exposed to
the air and in some cases enclosing the foreward part of the aeroplane,
like a ship’s prow, to diminish friction.
On the other hand we find some of the greatest authorities on aviation
disregarding this question almost entirely. In the Wright machines, for
instance, the surface of the wings is usually left comparatively rough,
and the sticks and wires are placed without any attention to diminishing
friction. This is true as well of the Delegrange, Voison and Farman
machines. Still other aviators design every detail of their machines to
cut down this so-called skin friction. The uprights, for instance, are
made elliptical in shape, with the sharp edges turned forward so that
they will cut their way the more smoothly through the air.
Several interesting attempts have been made to design a prow for an
aeroplane which will cut the air with the least possible amount of
friction. It is noticeable in these designs that the prows are very
blunt, like the prow of a canal boat, and not as might be expected,
sharp and narrow like that of a racing craft. The blunt-nosed prow is
considered best for the air ship, because the air being one eight
hundredth as dense as water offers very little resistance to its
entrance. It is so much easier, in other words, to push an air ship
through the air than a boat through water that there is no object in
sharpening its nose.
The air, however, in flowing along the sides of a rapidly moving body
sticks to it, and retards its progress relatively more than water
retards a boat. It is important, therefore, that the body of the
aeroplane be made very short, so that the sides will offer as little
friction as possible. This reverses the proportions of a water-borne
ship. We are so accustomed to see fast boats with long, narrow hulls,
that it comes as a surprise to find that a fast air ship must have a
very broad beam and as short a hull as possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account