The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 1 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 1 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
None whatever to the atom or molecule as at present existing in
the scientific conception. It can neither be compared with the
microscopic organisms, once classed among polygastric infusoria,
and now regarded as vegetable, and classed among algæ; nor is it
quite the _monas_ of the Peripatetics. Physically or
constitutionally the Mineral Monad differs, of course, from the
Human Monad, which is not physical, nor can its constitution be
rendered by chemical symbols and elements.(292)
In short, as the Spiritual Monad is One, Universal, Boundless and
Impartite, whose Rays, nevertheless, form what we, in our ignorance, call
the “Individual Monads” of men, so the Mineral Monad—being at the opposite
curve of the circle—is also One, and from it proceed the countless
physical atoms, which Science is beginning to regard as individualized.
Otherwise how could one account for, and explain mathematically,
the evolutionary and spiral progress of the four kingdoms? The
Monad is the combination of the last two principles in man, the
sixth and the seventh, and, properly speaking, the term “Human
Monad” applies only to the Dual Soul (Âtmâ‐Buddhi), not to its
highest spiritual vivifying principle, Âtmâ, alone. But since the
Spiritual Soul, if divorced from the latter (Âtmâ), could have no
existence, no being, it has thus been called.... Now the Monadic,
or rather Cosmic, Essence, if such a term be permitted, in the
mineral, vegetable and animal, though the same throughout the
series of cycles, from the lowest elemental up to the Deva
kingdom, yet differs in the scale of progression. It would be very
misleading to imagine a Monad as a separate Entity, trailing its
slow way in a distinct path through the lower kingdoms, and after
an incalculable series of transformations flowering into a human
being; in short, that the Monad of a Humboldt dates back to the
Monad of an atom of hornblende. Instead of saying a “Mineral
Monad,” the more correct phraseology in Physical Science, which
differentiates every atom, would of course have been to call it
“the Monad manifesting in that form of Prakriti called ‘the
Mineral Kingdom’.” The atom, as represented in the ordinary
scientific hypothesis, is not a particle of something, animated by
a psychic something, destined after æons to blossom into a man.
But it is a concrete manifestation of the Universal Energy, which
itself has not yet become individualized; a sequential
manifestation of the one Universal Monas. The Ocean of Matter does
not divide into its potential and constituent drops, until the
sweep of the life‐impulse reaches the evolutionary stage of man‐
birth. The tendency towards segregation into individual Monads is
gradual, and in the higher animals comes almost to the point. The
Peripatetics applied the word Monas to the whole Kosmos, in the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account