The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 1 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 1 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Discussing and explaining the nature of the invisible Elements and the
“Primordial Fire” mentioned above, Éliphas Lévi invariably calls it the
“Astral Light”: with him it is the “Grand Agent Magique.” Undeniably it is
so, but—only so far as _Black_ Magic is concerned, and on the lowest
planes of what we call Ether, the noumenon of which is Âkâsha; and even
this would be held incorrect by orthodox Occultists. The “Astral Light” is
simply the older “Sidereal Light” of Paracelsus; and to say that
“everything which exists has been evolved from it, and it preserves and
reproduces all forms,” as he does, is to enunciate truth only in the
second proposition. The first is erroneous; for if all that exists was
evolved _through_ (or _viâ_) it, this is not the Astral Light, since the
latter is not the container of _all_ things but, at best, only the
reflector of this _all_. Éliphas Lévi very truly shows it “a force in
Nature,” by means of which “a single man who can master it ... might throw
the world into confusion and transform its face”; for it is the “Great
Arcanum of transcendent Magic.” Quoting the words of the great Western
Kabalist in their translated form,(400) we may, perhaps, the better
explain them by the occasional addition of a word or two, to show the
difference between Western and Eastern explanations of the same subject.
The author says of the great Magic Agent:
This ambient and all‐penetrating fluid, this ray detached from the
[Central or Spiritual] Sun’s splendour ... fixed by the weight of
the atmosphere [?!] and the power of central attraction ... the
Astral Light, this electro‐magnetic ether, this vital and luminous
caloric, is represented on ancient monuments by the girdle of
Isis, which twines round two poles ... and in ancient theogonies
by the serpent devouring its own tail, emblem of prudence and of
Saturn [emblem of infinity, immortality, and Cronus—Time—not the
God Saturn or the planet]. It is the winged dragon of Medea, the
double serpent of the caduceus, and the tempter of Genesis; but it
is also the brazen snake of Moses encircling the Tau ... lastly,
it is the devil of exoteric dogmatism, and is really the blind
force [it is not blind, and Lévi knew it], which souls must
conquer, in order to detach themselves from the chains of Earth;
for if they should not, they will be absorbed by the same power
which first produced them, and will return to the central and
eternal fire.
This great Archæus is now publicly discovered by, and _for_, only one
man—J. W. Keely, of Philadelphia. For others, however, it _is_ discovered,
yet must remain almost useless. “So far shalt thou go....”
All the above is as practical as it is correct, save one error, which we
have explained. Éliphas Lévi commits a great blunder in always identifying
the Astral Light with what we call Âkâsha. What it really is will be
expounded in Volume II.
Éliphas Lévi further writes:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account