The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
all organized existence, we are finally told that the Monera are _their
own ancestors_. This may be very scientific, but it is very metaphysical
also; too much so, even for the Occultist.
If spontaneous generation has changed its methods now—owing, perhaps, to
accumulated material on hand—so as to almost escape detection, it was,
nevertheless, in full swing in the genesis of terrestrial life. Even the
simple physical form and the evolution of species show how Nature
proceeds. The scale‐bound, gigantic Saurian, the winged Pterodactyl, the
Megalosaurus, and the hundred feet long Iguanodon of the later period, are
the transformations of the earliest representatives of the animal kingdom
found in the sediments of the primary epoch. There was a time when all the
above enumerated “antediluvian” monsters appeared as filamentoid Infusoria
without shell or crust, with neither nerves, muscles, organs nor sex, and
reproduced their kind by gemmation; as do microscopical animals also, the
architects and builders of our mountain ranges, agreeably to the teachings
of Science. Why not man in this case? Why should he not have followed the
same law in his growth, _i.e._, gradual condensation? Every unprejudiced
person would prefer to believe that Primeval Humanity had at first an
Ethereal—or, if so preferred, a huge filamentoid, jelly‐like Form, evolved
by Gods or natural “Forces,” which grew, condensed throughout millions of
ages, and became gigantic in its physical impulse and tendency, until it
settled into the huge, physical form of the Fourth Race Man—rather than
believe him created of the dust of the Earth (literally), or from some
unknown anthropoid ancestor.
Nor does our Esoteric theory clash with scientific data, except on first
appearance, as Dr. A. Wilson, F.R.S., says, in a letter to _Knowledge_
(Dec. 23, 1881):
Evolution—rather nature, in the light of evolution—has only been
studied for some _twenty‐five years or so_. That is, of course, a
mere fractional space in the history of human thought.
And just because of this we do not lose all hope that Materialistic
Science will amend its ways, and will gradually accept the Esoteric
Teachings—if even at first divorced from their (to Science) too
metaphysical elements.
Has the last word on the subject of human evolution yet been said? As
Processor Huxley says:
Each such answer to the great question [man’s real place in
nature], invariably asserted by the followers of its propounder,
if not by himself, to be _complete and final_, remains in high
authority and esteem, it may be for one century, it may be for
twenty: but, as invariably, Time proves each reply to have been a
_mere approximation to the truth—tolerable chiefly on account of
the ignorance of those by whom it was accepted, and wholly
intolerable when tested by the larger knowledge of their
successors_.(353)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account