The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Helmholtz calculated that the cooling of our Earth from a temperature of
2,000° to 200° Cent. must have occupied a period of no less than
350,000,000 years. Western Science (including Geology) seems generally to
allow our Globe an age of about 500,000,000 years altogether. Sir William
Thomson, however, limits the appearance of the earliest vegetable life to
100,000,000 years ago—a statement respectfully contradicted by the Archaic
Records. Speculations, furthermore, vary daily in the domains of Science.
Meanwhile, some Geologists are very much opposed to such limitation.
Volger calculates:
That the time requisite for the deposit of the strata known to us
must at least have amounted to 648 millions of years.
Both time and space are infinite and eternal.
The earth, as a material existence, is indeed infinite; the
changes only which it has undergone can be determined by finite
periods of time....
We must therefore assume that the starry heaven is not merely in
space, which no astronomer doubts, but also in time, without
beginning or end; that it never was created, and is
imperishable.(358)
Czolbe repeats exactly what the Occultists say. But the Âryan Occultists,
we may be told, knew nothing of these later speculations. As Coleman says:
They were even ignorant of the globular form of our earth.
To this the _Vishnu Purâna_ contains a reply, which has forced certain
Orientalists to open their eyes very wide.
The sun is stationed, for all time, in the middle of the day, and
over against mid‐night, in all the Dvîpas [Continents], Maitreya.
But the rising and the setting _of the sun_ being perpetually
opposite _to each other_,—and, in the same way, all the cardinal
points, and so the cross‐points, Maitreya, people speak of the
rising of the sun where they see it; and where the sun disappears,
there, _to them_, is his setting. Of the sun, which is always _in
one and the same place_, there is neither setting nor rising; for
what is called rising and setting are _only_ the seeing and the
not seeing the sun.(359)
To this Fitzedward Hall remarks:
The heliocentricism taught in this passage is remarkable. It is
contradicted, however, a little further on.(360)
Contradicted _purposely_, because it was a secret temple‐teaching. Martin
Haug remarked the same teaching in another passage. It is useless to
calumniate the Âryans any longer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account