The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Since, in the exoteric accounts, the Asuras are the first Beings created
from the “Body of Night,” while the Pitris issue from that of “Twilight”;
the “Gods” being placed by Parâshara, in the _Vishnu Purâna_, between the
two, and shown to evolve from the “Body of the Day,” it is easy to
discover a determined purpose to veil the order of creation. Man is the
Arvâksrota coming from the “Body of the Dawn”; and elsewhere, man is again
referred to, when the Creator of the World, Brahmâ, is shown “creating
fierce beings, who were denominated Bhûtas, and eaters of flesh,” or as
the text has it, “fiends, frightful from being monkey‐coloured and
carnivorous.”(380) Whereas the Râkshasas are generally translated by “evil
Spirits” and “enemies of the Gods,” which identifies them with the Asuras.
In the _Râmâyana_, when Hanumân is reconnoitering the enemy in Lankâ, he
finds there Râkshasas, some hideous, “while some were beautiful to look
upon,” and, in the _Vishnu Purâna_, there is a direct reference to their
becoming the Saviours of “Humanity,” or of Brahmâ.
The allegory is very ingenious. Great intellect and too much knowledge are
a two‐edged weapon in life, and instruments for evil as well as for good.
When combined with selfishness, they will make of the whole of Humanity a
footstool for the elevation of him who possesses them, and a means for the
attainment of his objects; while, applied to altruistic humanitarian
purposes, they may become the means of the salvation of many. At all
events, the absence of self‐consciousness and intellect will make of man
an idiot, a brute in human form. Brahmâ is Mahat, the Universal Mind;
hence the too selfish among the Râkshasas showing the desire to become
possessed of it all—to “devour” Mahat. The allegory is transparent.
At any rate, Esoteric Philosophy identifies the pre‐Brâhmanical Asuras,
Rudras,(381) Râkshasas and all the “Adversaries” of the Gods in the
allegories, with the Egos, which, by incarnating in the still witless man
of the Third Race, made him _consciously_ immortal. They are, then, during
the cycle of Incarnations, the true _dual_ Logos—the conflicting and two‐
faced Divine Principle in Man. The Commentary that follows, and the next
Stanzas may, no doubt, throw more light on this very difficult tenet, but
the writer does not feel competent to give it out fully. Of the succession
of Races, however, the Commentary says:
_First come the __SELF‐EXISTENT__ on this Earth. They are the
__“__Spiritual Lives__”__ projected by the absolute __WILL__ and __LAW__,
at the Dawn of every Rebirth of the Worlds. These Lives are the divine
__“__Shishta__”__ [the Seed‐Manus, or the Prajâpatis and the Pitris]._
From these proceed:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account