The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
This is a point on which the teachings and modern biological speculation
are in perfect accord. The missing links representing this transition
process between reptile and bird are apparent to the veriest bigot,
especially in the Ornithoscelidæ, Hesperornis, and the Archæopteryx of
Vogt.
30. DURING THE THIRD,(417) THE BONELESS ANIMALS GREW AND CHANGED; THEY
BECAME ANIMALS WITH BONES, THEIR CHHÂYÂS BECAME SOLID.(418)
Vertebrates, and after that mammalians. Before that the animals were also
ethereal proto‐organisms, just as man was.
31. THE ANIMALS SEPARATED THE FIRST.(419) THEY BEGAN TO BREED. THE TWO‐
FOLD MAN(420) SEPARATED ALSO. HE(421) SAID: “LET US AS THEY; LET US UNITE
AND MAKE CREATURES.” THEY DID....
32. AND THOSE WHICH HAD NO SPARK(422) TOOK HUGE SHE‐ANIMALS UNTO THEM.
THEY BEGAT UPON THEM DUMB RACES. DUMB THEY(423) WERE THEMSELVES. BUT THEIR
TONGUES UNTIED.(424) THE TONGUES OF THEIR PROGENY REMAINED STILL. MONSTERS
THEY BRED. A RACE OF CROOKED RED‐HAIR‐COVERED MONSTERS GOING ON ALL
FOURS.(425) A DUMB RACE, TO KEEP THE SHAME UNTOLD.(426)
The fact of former hermaphrodite mammals and the subsequent separation of
sexes is now indisputable, even from the standpoint of Biology. As Prof.
Oscar Schmidt, an avowed Darwinist, shows:
Use and disuse, combined with selection, elucidate [?] _the
separation of the sexes_, and the existence, otherwise totally
incomprehensible, of rudimentary sexual organs. In the Vertebrata
especially, _each sex possesses such distinct traces of the
reproductive apparatus characteristic of the other_, that even
antiquity assumed hermaphroditism as a natural primæval condition
of mankind.... The tenacity with which these rudiments of sexual
organs are inherited is remarkable. In the class of mammals,
actual hermaphroditism is unheard of, although through the whole
period of their development they drag along with them these
residues, borne by _their unknown ancestry_, no one can say how
long.(427)
“The animals separated the first,” says Shloka 31. Bear in mind that at
that period men were different, even physiologically, to what they are
now; the middle point of the Fifth Race being already passed. We are not
told what the “huge she‐animals” were; but they certainly were as
different from any we now know, as were the “men” from the men of to‐day.
This was the first physical “fall into matter” of some of the then
existing and lower races. Bear in mind Shloka 24. The “Sons of Wisdom” had
spurned the _early_ Third Race, _i.e._, the non‐developed, and are shown
incarnating in, and thereby endowing with intellect, the _later_ Third
Race. Thus the sin of the brainless or “mindless” Races, who had no
“spark” and were irresponsible, fell upon those who failed to do by them
their Karmic duty.
What May Be The Objections To The Foregoing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account