The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
To close this rather lengthy comment, the Secret Doctrine teaches that the
Fire‐Devas, the Rudras, and the Kumâras, the “Virgin‐Angels,” (to whom the
Archangels, Michael and Gabriel, both belong,) the Divine “Rebels”—called
by the all‐materializing and positive Jews, the Nahash or
“Deprived”—preferred the _curse_ of _incarnation_ and the long cycles of
terrestrial existence and rebirths, to seeing the misery, even if
_unconscious_, of the beings who were evolved as Shadows out of their
Brethren, through the semi‐passive energy of their _too spiritual_
Creators. If “man’s uses of life should be such as neither to animalize
nor to spiritualize, but to _humanize_ Self,”(566) to do so, he must be
born _human_ not angelic. Hence, tradition shows the celestial Yogîs
offering themselves as voluntary victims in order to redeem Humanity,
which was created god‐like and perfect at first, and endow him with human
affections and aspirations. To do this they had to give up their natural
status, descend on our Globe, and take up their abode on it for the whole
cycle of the Mahâyuga, thus exchanging their impersonal Individualities
for individual Personalities—the bliss of sidereal existence for the curse
of terrestrial life. This voluntary sacrifice of the Fiery Angels, whose
nature was _Knowledge_ and _Love_, has been construed by the exoteric
theologies into a statement that shows “the Rebel Angels hurled down from
Heaven into the darkness of Hell”—our Earth. Hindû Philosophy hints at the
truth by teaching that the Asuras, hurled down by Shiva, are only in an
_intermediate state_, in which they prepare for higher degrees of
purification and redemption from their wretched condition; but Christian
Theology—claiming to be based on the rock of the divine love, charity, and
justice of him it appeals to as its Saviour—to paradoxically enforce that
claim, has invented the dreary dogma of Hell, that Archimedean lever of
Roman Catholic philosophy.
Whereas Rabbinical wisdom—than which there is none more positive,
materialistic, or grossly terrestrial, as it brings everything down to
physiological mysteries—calls these Beings, the “Evil One”; and the
Kabalists—Nahash, “Deprived,” as just said, and the Souls that have,
_after having been alienated in Heaven from the Holy One_, thrown
themselves into an Abyss at the dawn of their very existence, and have
anticipated the time when they are to descend on Earth.(567)
And let me explain at once that our quarrel is not with the _Zohar_ or any
other book of the _Kabalah_ in its right interpretation—for the latter is
the same as our own—but only with the gross, _pseudo_‐esoteric
explanations of the later, and especially of the Christian Kabalists.
Says the Commentary:
_Our earth and man [are] the products of the three Fires._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account