The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
remnant of an Atlantic continent, and, could it be traced further, would
establish the reality of a submarine horse‐shoe junction with a former
continent in the Indian Ocean.(745)
The _Atlantic portion of Lemuria_ was the geological basis of what is
generally known as Atlantis, but which must be regarded rather as a
development of the Atlantic prolongation of Lemuria than as an entirely
new mass of land upheaved to meet the special requirements of the Fourth
Root‐Race. Just as in the case of Race evolution, so in that of the
shifting and re‐shifting of Continental masses, no hard and fast line can
be drawn as to where a new order ends and another begins. Continuity in
natural processes is never broken. Thus the Fourth‐Race Atlanteans were
developed from a nucleus of Northern Lemurian Third‐Race Men, centred,
roughly speaking, toward a point of land in what is now the mid‐Atlantic
Ocean. Their Continent was formed by the coalescence of many islands and
peninsulas which were upheaved in the ordinary course of time and
ultimately became the true home of the great Race known as the Atlanteans.
After this consummation was once attained it follows, as stated on the
highest Occult authority, that:
_Lemuria should no more be confounded with the Atlantis Continent, than
Europe with America._(746)
The above, coming from quarters so discredited by orthodox Science, will,
of course, be regarded as a more or less happy fiction. Even the clever
work of Donnelly, already mentioned, is put aside, notwithstanding that
its statements are all confined within a frame of strictly scientific
proofs. But we write for the future. New discoveries in this direction
will vindicate the claim of the Asiatic Philosophers, that
sciences—Geology, Ethnology, and History included—were pursued by the
Antediluvian nations who lived untold ages ago. Future “finds” will
justify the correctness of the present observations of such acute minds as
H. A. Taine and Renan. The former shows that the civilizations of such
archaic nations as the Egyptians, Âryans of India, Chaldæans, Chinese, and
Assyrians are the result of preceding civilizations lasting “_myriads_ of
centuries”;(747) and the latter points to the fact that:
Egypt at the beginning appears mature, old, and entirely without
mythical and heroic ages, as if the country had never known youth.
Its civilization has no infancy, and its art no archaic period.
The civilization of the Old Monarchy did not begin with infancy.
It was already mature.(748)
To this Professor R. Owen adds that:
Egypt is recorded to have been a civilized and governed community
_before_ the time of Menes.
And Winchell states that:
At the epoch of Menes the Egyptians were already a civilized and
numerous people. Manetho tells us that Athotis, the son of this
first king Menes, built the palace of Memphis; that he was a
physician, and left _anatomical books_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account