The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
It was perhaps the recognition of a germ of that which, later on, in the
then nascent Church, grew into the virus of insatiate power and ambition,
culminating finally in the dogma of infallibility, that forced Simon, and
so many others, to break away from her at her very birth. Sects and
dissensions began with the first century. While Paul rebukes Peter to his
face, John slanders under the veil of vision the Nicolaitans, and makes
Jesus declare that he hates them.(209) Therefore we pay little attention
to the accusations against Simon in the MS. found in Greece.
It is entitled _Philosophumena_. Its author, regarded as Saint Hippolytus
by the Greek Church, is referred to as an “unknown heretic” by the
Papists, only because he speaks in it “very slanderously” of Pope
Callistus, also a Saint. Nevertheless, Greeks and Latins agree in
declaring the _Philosophumena_ to be an extraordinary and very erudite
work. Its antiquity and genuineness have been vouched for by the best
authorities of Tübingen.
Whoever the author may have been, he expresses himself about Simon in this
wise:
Simon, a man well versed in magic arts, deceived many persons
partly by the art of Thrasymedes,(210) and partly _with the help
of demons_.(211)... He determined to pass himself off as a god....
Aided by his wicked arts, he turned to profit not only the
teachings of Moses, but those of the poets.... His disciples use
to this day his charms. Thanks to incantations, to philtres, to
their attractive caresses(212) and what they call “sleeps,” they
send demons to influence all those whom they would fascinate. With
this object they employ what they call “familiar demons.”(213)
Further on the MS. reads:
The Magus (Simon) made those who wished to enquire of the demon,
write what their question was on a leaf of parchment; this, folded
in four, was thrown into a burning brazier, in order that the
smoke should reveal the contents of the writing to the Spirit
(demon) (_Philos._, IV. iv.). Incense was thrown by handfuls on
the blazing coals, the Magus adding, on pieces of papyrus, the
Hebrew names of the Spirits he was addressing, and the flame
devoured all. Very soon the _divine_ Spirit seemed to overwhelm
the Magician, who uttered unintelligible invocations, and plunged
in such a state he answered every question—phantasmal apparitions
being often raised over the flaming brazier (_ibid._, iii.); at
other times fire descended from heaven upon objects previously
pointed out by the Magician (_ibid._); or again the deity evoked,
crossing the room, would trace fiery orbs in its flight (_ibid._,
ix.).(214)
So far the above statements agree with those of Anastasius the Sinaïte:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account