The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
This only goes to show that, as to another phase, John and Jesus
were but epitomisers of the history of the same sun, under
differences of aspect or condition; and one condition following
another, of necessity, the statement, _Luke_, ix. 7, was not only
not an empty one, but it was true, that which “was said of some,
that (in Jesus) John was risen from the dead.” (And this
consideration serves to explain why it has been that the _Life of
Apollonius of Tyana_, by Philostratus, has been so persistently
kept back from translation and from popular reading. Those who
have studied it in the original have been forced to the comment
that either the _Life of Apollonius_ has been taken from the _New
Testament_, or that the _New Testament_ narratives have been taken
from the _Life of Apollonius_, because of the manifest sameness of
the _means of construction_ of the narratives. The explanation is
simple enough, when it is considered that the names of _Jesus_,
Hebrew יש, and Apollonius, or Apollo, are alike names of _the sun
in the heavens_; and necessarily the history of the one, as to his
travels through _the signs_, with the personifications of his
sufferings, triumphs and miracles, could be but the _history of
the other_, where there was a widespread, common method of
describing those travels by personification.) It seems also that,
for long afterward, all this was known to rest upon an
astronomical basis; for the secular church, so to speak, was
founded by Constantine, and the objective condition of the worship
established was that part of his decree, in which it was affirmed
that the venerable day of the _sun_ should be the day set apart
for the worship of Jesus Christ, as _Sun_‐day. There is something
weird and startling in some other facts about this matter. The
prophet Daniel (_true prophet_, as says Graetz),(253) by use of
the pyramid numbers, or astrological numbers, foretold the cutting
off of the _Méshiac_, as it happened (which would go to show the
accuracy of his astronomical knowledge, if there was an eclipse of
the sun at that time).... Now, however, the temple was destroyed
in the year 71, in the month Virgo, and 71 is the Dove number, as
shown, or 71 × 5 = 355, and with _the fish_, a Jehovah number.
“Is it possible,” queries further on the author, thus answering the
intimate thought of every Christian and Occultist who reads and studies
his work:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account