The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
According to King and other numismatists and archæologists, the
cross was placed there as the symbol of eternal life. Such a Tau,
or Egyptian cross, was used in the Bacchic and Eleusinian
Mysteries. Symbol of the dual generative power, it was laid upon
the breast of the Initiate, after his “new birth” was
accomplished, and the Mystæ had returned from their baptism in the
sea. It was a mystic sign that his spiritual birth had regenerated
and united his astral soul with his divine spirit, and that he was
ready to ascend in spirit to the blessed abodes of light and
glory—the Eleusinia. The Tau was a magic talisman at the same time
as a religious emblem. It was adopted by the Christians through
the Gnostics and Kabalists, who used it largely, as their numerous
gems testify. These in turn had the Tau (or handled cross) from
the Egyptians, and the Latin Cross from the Buddhist missionaries,
who brought it from India (where it can be found even now) two or
three centuries B.C. The Assyrians, Egyptians, ancient Americans,
Hindus and Romans had it in various, but very slight modifications
of shape. Till very late in the middle ages, it was considered a
potent spell again at epilepsy and demoniacal possession, and the
“signet of the living God” brought down in St. John’s vision by
the angel ascending from the east to “seal the servants of our God
in the foreheads,” was but the same mystic Tau—the Egyptian Cross.
In the painted glass of St. Denis (France) this angel is
represented as stamping this sign on the forehead of the elect;
the legend reads, SIGNUM TAY. In King’s _Gnostics_, the author
reminds us that “this mark is commonly borne by St. Anthony, an
_Egyptian_ recluse.”(269) What the real meaning of the Tau was, is
explained to us by the Christian St. John, the Egyptian Hermes,
and the Hindu Brahmans. It is but too evident that, with the
Apostle at least, it meant the “Ineffable Name,” as he calls this
“signet of the living God” a few chapters further on(270) the
“_Father’s name written in their foreheads_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account