The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Finally, it is demonstrated by internal as well as by external evidence,
on the testimony of the best European Hebraists, and the confessions of
the learned Jewish Rabbis themselves, that “an ancient document forms the
essential basis of the _Bible_, which received very considerable
insertions and supplements;” and that “the Pentateuch arose out of the
primitive or older document by means of a supplementary one.” Therefore in
the absence of the _Book of Numbers_,(353) the Kabalists of the West are
only entitled to come to definite conclusions, when they have at hand some
data at least from that “ancient document”—data now found scattered
throughout Egyptian papyri, Assyrian tiles, and the traditions preserved
by the descendants of the disciples of the last Nazars. Instead of that,
most of them accept as their authorities and infallible guides Sabre
d’Olivet—who was a man of immense erudition and of speculative mind, but
neither a Kabalist nor an Occultist, either Western or Eastern—and the
Mason Ragon, the greatest of the “Widow’s sons,” who was even less of an
Orientalist than d’Olivet, for Sanskrit learning was almost unknown in the
days of both these eminent scholars.
SECTION XXI. HEBREW ALLEGORIES.
How can any Kabalist, acquainted with the foregoing, deduce his
conclusions with regard to the true Esoteric beliefs of the primitive
Jews, from that only which he now finds in the Jewish scrolls? How can any
scholar—even though one of the keys to the universal language be now
positively discovered, the true key to the numerical reading of a pure
geometrical system—give out anything as his _final_ conclusion? Modern
Kabalistic speculation is on a par now with modern “speculative Masonry;”
for as the latter tries vainly to link itself with the ancient—or rather
the archaic—Masonry of the Temples, failing to make the link because all
its claims have been shown to be inaccurate from an archæological
standpoint, so fares it also with Kabalistic speculation. As no mystery of
Nature worth running after can be revealed to humanity by settling whether
Hiram Abif was a living Sidonian builder, or a solar myth, so no fresh
information will be added to Occult Lore by the details of the exoteric
privileges conferred on the Collegia Fabrorum by Numa Pompilius. Rather
must the symbols used in it be studied in the Âryan light, since all the
Symbolism of the ancient Initiations came to the West with the light of
the Eastern Sun. Nevertheless, we find the most learned Masons and
Symbologists declaring that all these weird symbols and glyphs, that run
back to a common origin of immense antiquity, were nothing more than a
display of cunning natural phallicism, or emblems of primitive typology.
How much nearer the truth is the author of _The Source of Measures_, who
declares that the elements of human and numerical construction in the
_Bible_ do not shut out the spiritual elements in it, albeit so few now
understand them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account