The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
To find the real meaning of the symbolism involved in this word
Elohim we must go to that key of Jewish Esoteric Doctrine, the
little‐known and less‐understood _Kabalah_. There we shall find
that this word represents two united masculine and feminine
Potencies, co‐equal and co‐eternal, conjoined in everlasting union
for the maintenance of the Universe—the great Father and Mother of
Nature, into whom the Eternal One conforms himself before the
Universe can subsist. For the teaching of the _Kabalah_ is that
before the Deity conformed himself thus—_i.e._ as male and
female—the Worlds of the Universe could not subsist; or in the
words of _Genesis_, that “the earth was formless and void.” Thus,
then, is the conformation of the Elohim, the end of the Formless
and the Void and the Darkness, for only after that conformation
can the _Ruach Elohim_—the “Spirit of the Elohim”—vibrate upon the
countenance of the Waters. But this is a very small part of the
information which the Initiate can derive from the _Kabalah_
concerning this word _Elohim_.
Attention must here be called to the confusion—if not worse—which reigns
in the Western interpretations of the _Kabalah_. The Eternal _One_ is said
to conform himself into two: the Great Father and Mother of Nature. To
begin with, it is a horribly anthropomorphic conception to apply terms
implying sexual distinction to the earliest and first differentiations of
the One. And it is even more erroneous to identify these first
differentiations—the Purusha and Prakriti of Indian Philosophy—with the
Elohim, the creative powers here spoken of; and to ascribe to these (to
our intellects) unimaginable abstractions, the formation and construction
of this visible world, full of pain, sin, and sorrow. In truth, the
“creation by the Elohim” spoken of here is but a much later “creation,”
and the Elohim far from being supreme, or even exalted powers in Nature,
are only lower Angels. This was the teaching of the Gnostics, the most
philosophical of all the early Christian Churches. They taught that the
imperfections of the world were due to the imperfection of its Architects
or Builders—the imperfect, and therefore inferior, Angels. The Hebrew
Elohim correspond to the Prajâpati of the Hindus, and it is shown
elsewhere from the Esoteric interpretation of the Purânas that the
Prajâpati were the fashioners of man’s material and astral form _only_:
that they could not give him intelligence or reason, and therefore in
symbolical language they “failed to create man.” But, not to repeat what
the reader can find elsewhere in this work, his attention needs only to be
called to the fact that “creation” in this passage is not the Primary
Creation, and that the Elohim are not “_God_,” nor even the higher
Planetary Spirits, but the Architects of this visible physical planet and
of man’s material body, or encasement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account