The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
As to the personal opinion of Döllinger, a Papist, and of Seldenus, a
Protestant—both of whom trace Jehovah in the teraphim of the Jews and
“evil spirits” in those of the Pagans—it is the usual one‐sided judgment
of _odium theologicum_ and sectarianism. Seldenus is right, however, in
arguing that in the days of old, all such modes of communication had been
primarily established for purposes of divine and angelic communications
only. But
The holy Spirit (spirits, rather) spake [not] to the children of
Israel [alone] by urim and thummim, while the tabernacle remained,
as Dr. A. Cruden would have people believe. Nor had the Jews alone need of
a “tabernacle” for such a kind of theophanic, or divine communication; for
no Bath‐Kol (or “Daughter of the divine Voice”), called thummim, could be
heard whether by Jew, Pagan, or Christian, were there not a fit tabernacle
for it. The “tabernacle” was simply the archaic telephone of those days of
Magic when Occult powers were acquired by Initiation, just as they are
now. The nineteenth century has replaced with an electric telephone the
“tabernacle” of specified metals, wood, and special arrangements, and has
natural mediums instead of high priests and hierophants. Why should people
wonder, then, that instead of reaching Planetary Spirits and Gods,
believers should now communicate with no greater beings than elementals
and animated shells—the demons of Porphyry? Who these were, he tells us
candidly in his work _On the Good and Bad Demons_:
They whose ambition is to be taken for Gods, and whose leader
demands to be recognized as the Supreme God.
Most decidedly—and it is not the Theosophists who will ever deny the
fact—there are good as well as bad spirits, beneficent and malevolent
“Gods” in all ages. The whole trouble was, and still is, to know which is
which. And this, we maintain, the Christian Church knows no more than her
profane flock. If anything proves this, it is, most decidedly, the
numberless theological blunders made in this direction. It is idle to call
the Gods of the heathen “devils,” and then to copy their symbols in such a
servile manner, enforcing the distinction between the good and the bad
with no weightier proof than that they are respectively Christian and
Pagan. The planets—the elements of the Zodiac—have not figured only at
Heliopolis as the twelve stones called the “mysteries of the elements”
(elementorum arcana). On the authority of many an orthodox Christian
writer they were found also in Solomon’s temple, and may be seen to this
day in several old Italian churches, and even in Notre Dame of Paris.
One would really say that the warning in Clement’s _Stromateis_ has been
given in vain, though he is supposed to quote words pronounced by St.
Peter. He says:
Do not adore God as the Jews do, who think they are the only ones
to know Deity and fail to perceive that, instead of God, they are
worshipping angels, the lunar months, and the moon.(448)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account