The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
De Mirville seems to quote from texts either rejected by or unknown to
Protestants, in whose bible there is no forty‐third chapter of
_Ecclesiastes_; nor is the sun made to go “in circuits” in the latter, but
the wind. This is a question to be settled between the Roman and the
Protestant Churches. Our point is the strong element of Sabæanism or
Heliolatry present in Christianity.
An Œcumenical Council having authoritatively put a stop to Christian
Astrolatry by declaring that there were no sidereal Souls in sun, moon, or
planets, St. Thomas took upon himself to settle the point in dispute. The
“angelic doctor” announced that such expressions did not mean a “soul,”
but only an Intelligence, not resident in the sun or stars, but one that
assisted them, “a guiding and directing intelligence.”(596)
Thereupon the author, comforted by the explanation, quotes Clement the
Alexandrian, and reminds the reader of the opinion of that philosopher,
the inter‐relation that exists “between the seven branches of the
candlestick—the seven stars of the Revelation,” and the sun:
The six branches (says Clement) fixed to the central candlestick
have lamps, but the sun placed in the midst of the wandering ones
(πλανητῶν) pours his beams on them all; this golden candlestick
hides one more mystery: it is the sign of Christ, not only in
shape, but because he sheds his light through the ministry of the
seven spirits primarily created, and who are the Seven Eyes of the
Lord. Therefore the principal planets are to the seven primeval
spirits, according to St. Clement, that which the candlestick‐sun
is to Christ Himself, namely—their vessels, their φυλαχαὶ.
Plain enough, to be sure; though one fails to see that this explanation
even helps the situation. The seven‐branched chandelier of the Israelites,
as well as the “wanderers” of the Greeks, had a far more natural meaning,
a purely astrological one to begin with. In fact from Magi and Chaldæans
down to the much‐laughed‐at Zadkiel, every astrological work will tell its
reader that the Sun placed in the midst of the planets, with Saturn,
Jupiter and Mars on one side, and Venus, Mercury and the Moon on the
other, the planets’ line crossing through the whole Earth, has always
meant what Hermes tells us, namely, the thread of destiny, or that whose
action (influence) is called destiny.(597) But symbol for symbol we prefer
the sun to a candlestick. One can understand how the latter came to
represent the sun and planets, but no one can admire the chosen symbol.
There is poetry and grandeur in the sun when it is made to symbolize the
“Eye of Ormuzd,” or of Osiris, and is regarded as the Vâhan (vehicle) of
the highest Deity. But one must for ever fail to perceive that any
particular glory is rendered to Christ by assigning to him the trunk of a
candlestick,(598) in a Jewish synagogue, as a mystical seat of honour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account