The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
And he is but saying what the ancients taught. Iamblichus gives this dogma
of the duality of all the planets and celestial bodies, of gods and
daimons (spirits). He also divides the Archontes into two classes—the more
and the less spiritual; the latter more connected with and clothed with
matter, as having a _form_, while the former are bodiless (_arûpa_). But
what have Satan and his angels to do with all this? Perhaps only that the
identity of the Zoroastrian dogma with the Christian, and of Mithra,
Ormuzd, and Ahriman with the Christian Father, Son, and Devil, might be
accounted for. And when we say “Zoroastrian dogmas” we mean the exoteric
teaching. How explain the same relations between Mithra and Ormuzd as
those between the Archangel Mikael and Christ?
Ahura Mazda says to holy Zaratushta: “When I _created_ [emanated]
Mithra ... I created him that he should be invoked and adored
equally with myself.”
For the sake of necessary reforms, the Zoroastrian Âryans transformed the
Devas, the bright Gods of India, into devs or devils. It was their Karma
that in their turn the Christians should vindicate on this point the
Hindus. Now Ormuzd and Mithra have become the devs of Christ and Mikael,
the dark lining and aspect of the Saviour and Angel. The day of the Karma
of Christian theology will come in its turn. Already the Protestants have
begun the first chapter of the religion that will seek to transform the
“Seven Spirits” and the host of the Roman Catholics into demons and idols.
Every religion has its Karma, as has every individual. That which is due
to human conception and is built on the abasement of our brothers who
disagree with us, must have its day. “There is no religion higher than
truth.”
The Zoroastrians, Mazdeans, and Persians borrowed their conceptions from
India; the Jews borrowed their theory of angels from Persia; the
Christians borrowed from the Jews.
Hence the latest interpretation by Christian theology—to the great disgust
of the synagogue, forced to share the symbolical candlestick with the
hereditary enemy—that the seven‐branched candlestick represents the seven
Churches of Asia and the seven planets which are the angels of those
Churches. Hence also, the conviction that the Mosaic Jews, the inventors
of that symbol for their tabernacle, were a kind of Sabæans, who blended
their planets and the spirits thereof into one, and called them—only far
later—Jehovah. For this we have the testimony of Clemens Alexandrinus, St.
Hieronymus and others.
And Clement, as an Initiate of the Mysteries—at which the secret of the
heliocentric system was taught several thousands of years before Galileo
and Copernicus—proves it by explaining that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account