The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Reduced to its simplest expression and popular meaning, this is of course
fetish worship. Yet esoteric astrolatry was not at all the worship of
idols, since under the names of “Councillors” and “Lictors,” present at
the “Sun’s consistory,” it was not the planets in their material bodies
that were meant, but their Regents or “Souls” (Spirits). If the prayer
“Our Father in heaven,” or “Saint” so‐and‐so in “Heaven” is not an
idolatrous invocation, then “Our Father in Mercury,” or “Our Lady in
Venus,” “Queen of Heaven,” etc., is no more so; for it is precisely the
same thing, the name making no difference in the act. The word used in the
Christian prayers, “in heaven” cannot mean anything abstract. A
dwelling—whether of Gods, angels or Saints (every one of these being
anthropomorphic individualities and beings)—must necessarily mean a
locality, some defined spot in that “heaven”; hence it is quite immaterial
for purposes of worship whether that spot be considered as “heaven” in
general, meaning nowhere in particular, or in the Sun, Moon or Jupiter.
The argument is futile that there were
Two deities, and two distinct hierarchies or _tsabas_ in heaven,
in the ancient world as in our modern times ... the one, the
living God and his host, and the other, _Satan_, Lucifer with his
councillors and lictors, or the _fallen_ angels.
Our opponents say that it is the latter which Plato with the whole of
antiquity worshipped, and which two‐thirds of humanity worship to this
day. “The whole question is to know how to discern between the two.”
Protestant Christians fail to find any mention of angels in the
Pentateuch, we may therefore leave them aside. The Roman Catholics and the
Kabalists find such mention; the former, because they have accepted Jewish
angelology, without suspecting that the “tsabæan Hosts” were colonists and
settlers on Judæan territory from the lands of the Gentiles; the latter,
because they accepted the bulk of the Secret Doctrine, keeping the kernel
for themselves and leaving the husks to the unwary.
Cornelius a Lapide points out and proves the meaning of the word _tsaba_
in the first verse of Chapter ii. of _Genesis_; and he does so correctly,
guided, as he probably was, by learned Kabalists. The Protestants are
certainly wrong in their contention, for angels _are_ mentioned in the
Pentateuch under the word _tsaba_, which means “hosts” of angels. In the
Vulgate the word is translated _ornatus_, meaning the “sidereal army,” the
_ornament_ also of the sky—kabalistically. The biblical scholars of the
Protestant Church, and the _savants_ among the materialists, who failed to
find “angels” mentioned by Moses, have thus committed a serious error. For
the verse reads:
Thus the heaven and the earth were finished and all the host of
them,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account