The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
We have already drawn attention to the facts that the record of the life
of a World‐Saviour is emblematical, and must be read by its mystic
meaning, and that the figures 432 have a cosmic evolutionary significance.
We find these two facts throwing light on the origin of the exoteric
Christian religion, and clearing away much of the obscurity surrounding
its beginnings. For is it not clear that the names and characters in the
Synoptical Gospels and in that of St. John are not historical? Is it not
evident that the compilers of the life of Christ, desirous to show that
the birth of their Master was a cosmic, astronomical, and divinely‐
preördained event, attempted to coördinate the same with the end of the
secret cycle, 4,320? When facts are collated this answers to them as
little as does the other cycle of “thirty‐three solar years, seven months,
and seven days,” which has also been brought forward as supporting the
same claim, the soli‐lunar cycle in which the Sun gains on the Moon one
solar year. The combination of the three figures, 4, 3, 2, with cyphers
according to the cycle and Manvantara concerned, was, and is, preëminently
Hindu. It will remain a secret even though several of its significant
features are revealed. It relates, for instance, to the Pralaya of the
races in their periodical dissolution, before which events a special
Avatâra has always to descend and incarnate on earth. These figures were
adopted by all the older nations, such as those of Egypt and Chaldæa, and
before them were current among the Atlanteans. Evidently some of the more
learned among the early Church Fathers who had dabbled, whilst Pagans, in
temple secrets, knew them to relate to the Avatâric or Messianic mystery,
and tried to apply this cycle to the birth of their Messiah; they failed
because the figures relate to the respective ends of the Root‐Races and
not to any individual. In their badly‐directed efforts, moreover, an error
of five years occurred. Is it possible, if their claims as to the
importance and universality of the event were correct, that such a vital
mistake should have been allowed to creep into a chronological computation
preördained and traced in the heavens by the finger of God? Again, what
were the Pagan and even Jewish Initiates doing, if this claim as to Jesus
be correct? Could they, the custodians of the key to the secret cycles and
Avatâras, the heirs of all the Âryan, Egyptian, and Chaldæan wisdom, have
failed to recognise their great “God‐Incarnate,” one with Jehovah,(634)
their Saviour of the latter days, him whom all the nations of Asia still
expect as their Kalki Avatâra, Maitreya Buddha, Sosiosh, Messiah, etc.?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account