The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
“Obvious” truly, and something else besides. For, if Jesus pronounced the
words in the sense attributed to him, then he must have read the _Book of
Enoch_—a purely Kabalistic, Occult work, and he therefore recognised the
worth and value of a treatise now declared apocryphal by his Churches.
Moreover, he could not have been ignorant that these words belonged to the
oldest ritual of Initiation.(134) And if he had not read it, and the
sentence belongs to John, or whoever wrote the Fourth Gospel, then what
reliance can be placed on the authenticity of other sayings and parables
attributed to the Christian Saviour?
Thus, De Mirville’s illustration is an unfortunate one. Every other proof
brought by the Church to show the infernal character of the ante‐and‐anti‐
Christian copyists may be as easily disposed of. This is perhaps
unfortunate, but it is a fact, nevertheless—_Magna est veritas et
prevalebit_.
The above is the answer of the Occultists to the two parties who charge
them incessantly, the one with “Superstition,” and the other with
“Sorcery.” To those of our Brothers who are Christians, and twit us with
the secresy imposed upon the Eastern Chelâs, adding invariably that their
own “Book of God” is “an open volume” for all “to read, understand, and
_be saved_,” we would reply by asking them to study what we have just said
in this Section, and then to refute it—if they can. There are very few in
our days who are still prepared to assure their readers that the _Bible_
had God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth without any
mixture of error for its matter.
Could Locke be asked the question now, he would perhaps be unwilling to
repeat again that the _Bible_ is
all pure, all sincere, nothing too much, nothing wanting.
The _Bible_, if it is not to be shown to be the very reverse of all this,
sadly needs an interpreter acquainted with the doctrines of the East, as
they are to be found in its secret volumes; nor is it safe now, after
Archbishop Laurence’s translation of the _Book of Enoch_, to cite Cowper
and assure us that the _Bible_
... gives a light to every age,
It gives, but borrows none.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account