The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Thus far we learn that the _Book of Enoch_ was published before
the Christian Era by some great Unknown of Semitic [?] race, who,
believing himself to be inspired in a post‐prophetic age, borrowed
the name of an antediluvian patriarch(145) to authenticate his own
enthusiastic forecast of the Messianic kingdom. And as the
contents of his marvellous book enter freely into the composition
of the _New Testament_, it follows that if the author was not an
inspired prophet, who predicted the teachings of Christianity, he
was a visionary enthusiast whose illusions were accepted by
Evangelists and Apostles as revelation—alternative conclusions
which involve the Divine or human origin of Christianity.(146)
The outcome of all of which is, in the words of the same Editor:
The discovery that the language and ideas of alleged revelation
are found in a preëxistent work, accepted by Evangelists and
Apostles as inspired, but classed by modern theologians among
apocryphal productions.(147)
This accounts also for the unwillingness of the reverend librarians of the
Bodleian Library to publish the Ethiopian text of the _Book of Enoch_.
The prophecies of the _Book of Enoch_ are indeed prophetic, but they were
intended for, and cover the records of, the five Races out of the
seven—everything relating to the last two being kept secret. Thus the
remark made by the Editor of the English translation, that:
Chapter xcii. records a series of prophecies extending from
Enoch’s own time to about one thousand years beyond the present
generation,(148)
is faulty. The prophecies extend to the end of our present Race, not
merely to a “thousand years” hence. Very true that:
In the system of [Christian] chronology adopted, a day stands
[occasionally] for a hundred, and a week for seven hundred
years.(149)
But this is an arbitrary and fanciful system adopted by Christians to make
Biblical chronology fit with facts or theories, and does not represent the
original thought. The “days” stand for the undetermined periods of the
Side‐Races, and the “weeks” for the Sub‐Races, the Root‐Races being
referred to by an expression that is not even found in the English
translation. Moreover the sentence at the bottom of page 150:
Subsequently, in the fourth week ... the visions of the holy and
the righteous shall be seen, the order of generation after
generation shall take place,(150)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account