The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
The above applies to the Elect Initiates, and not at all to the Jews, the
supposed chosen people, or to the Babylonian captivity, as interpreted by
the Christian theologians. Considering that we find Enoch, or his
perpetuator, mentioning the execution of the “decree upon sinners” in
several different weeks,(155) saying that “every work of the ungodly shall
disappear from the whole earth” during this fourth time (the Fourth Race),
it surely can hardly apply to the one solitary Deluge of the _Bible_,
still less to the Captivity.
It follows, therefore, that as the _Book of Enoch_ covers the five Races
of the Manvantara, with a few allusions to the last two, it does not
contain “Biblical prophecies,” but simply facts taken out of the Secret
Books of the East. The editor, moreover, confesses that:
The preceding six verses, _viz._, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th,
and 18th, are taken from between the 14th and 15th verses of the
nineteenth chapter, where they are to be found in the MSS.(156)
By this arbitrary transposition, he has made confusion still more
confused. Yet he is quite right in saying that the doctrines of the
_Gospels_, and even of the _Old Testament_, have been taken bodily from
the _Book of Enoch_, for this is as evident as the sun in heaven. The
whole of the _Pentateuch_ was adapted to fit in with the facts given, and
this accounts for the Hebrews refusing to give the book a place in their
Canon, just as the Christians have subsequently refused to admit it among
their canonical works. The fact that the Apostle Jude and many of the
Christian Fathers referred to it as a revelation and a sacred volume, is,
however, an excellent proof that the early Christians accepted it; among
these the most learned—as, for instance, Clement of Alexandria—understood
Christianity and its doctrines in quite a different light from their
modern successors, and viewed Christ under an aspect that Occultists only
can appreciate. The early Nazarenes and Chrestians, as Justin Martyr calls
them, were the followers of Jesus, of the true Chrestos and Christos of
Initiation; whereas, the modern Christians, especially those of the West,
may be Papists, Greeks, Calvinists, or Lutherans, but can hardly be called
Christians, _i.e._, the followers of Jesus, the Christ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account