Cotner assured himself that no Springdale scouts had gained admission
to the field that day and passed the news to Dick. Consequently, in the
third and fourth periods, the team tried out some of the new plays on
Weston and saw with much satisfaction that they puzzled the adversary
and gained ground. Although a light team, Weston was quick to size-up
plays, and that the new ones succeeded against her argued particularly
well for them. Dick put in what was practically an entirely substitute
line-up in the fourth quarter and the subs gave an excellent account
of themselves. When the final whistle blew the score was Clearfield
26, Weston 0. There still remained much to be accomplished in the
remaining four days of practice before the Springdale contest, but, on
the whole, Dick was satisfied with the work of his charges. The attack
was not yet as smooth as he wanted it, but on the defense the team
had shown up finely, and against a team which, if not powerful, was
more than ordinarily versatile and resourceful. Dick’s defense against
forward passes worked well, and Gordon Merrick at left end and Felker
at right covered themselves with glory. Clearfield’s own attempts at
forward passing were not very successful, but Weston had been coached
to guard against such plays and was consequently hard to deceive. The
Number 8 Play did, however, catch her napping on two occasions. The
school at large went away highly pleased with the showing of their team
and predicting rout and disaster for Springdale the following Saturday.
Springdale, too, overwhelmed a weak opponent that afternoon, as Dick
learned by stopping at the Square on his way home with Gordon in Eli.
In fact, Springdale had scored seven more points than had Clearfield.
But, since it was a question whether Springdale’s adversary was not an
even weaker team than Weston, Dick refused to be troubled.
On Sunday Fudge called for his blue-book and was at first plainly
disappointed at Dick’s verdict. When, however, Dick had explained that
what the team wanted was a play that was deceptive rather than merely
involved Fudge took heart again. Fudge was a born optimist, anyway, and
it took more than one disappointment to discourage him.
“I g-g-get you now, Dick,” he said, pocketing his blank-book. “You
l-l-leave it to m-m-me! I thought of a dandy play this morning in
church, but I’ve got to work it out. I’ll show it to you to-morrow.
Talk about deceptiveness! Gee, this is a c-c-corker.”
“That’s fine,” said Dick, with a smile for Fudge’s confidence. “What’s
it like?”
But Fudge refused to divulge any information regarding it, taking
himself off with renewed requests for Dick to leave it to him! Which
Dick, having lost faith in Fudge’s ability as a football tactician, was
perfectly willing to do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account