"That ye may know how that the Lord doth put a difference between the
Egyptians and Israel." There is the rock of separation upon which the
Church builded; the rock upon which it will presently split. The god of
the Jews set a difference between Israel and Egypt. So much for the
fatherhood of God. The Son sets the same difference, dividing the sheep
from the goats, according to the opinions they form of his claim to
godship. So much for the brotherhood of man. Christianity merely
caricatures both propositions. Nor do I see how we can attain any worthy
ideal of human brotherhood while this Christianity prevails: We must be
sheep and goats among ourselves, some in heaven, some in hell, still
seeking out reasons "Why the Saints in Glory Should Rejoice at the
Sufferings of the Damned." We shall be saints and sinners, sated and
starving. A God who separates them in some future life will have children
that separate themselves here upon His own very excellent authority. That
is why one brother of us must work himself to death while another idles
himself to death--because God has set a difference, and his Son after him,
and the Church after that. The defect in social Christendom to-day, sir,
is precisely this defect of the Christian faith--its separation, its
failure to teach what it chiefly boasts of teaching. We have, in
consequence, a society of thinly veneered predatoriness. And this, I
believe, is why our society is quite as unstable today as the Church
itself. They are both awakening to a new truth--which is _not_ separation.
The man who is proud of our Christian civilisation has ideals susceptible
of immense elevation. Christianity has more souls in its hell and fewer in
its heaven than any other religion whatsoever. Naturally, Christian
society is one of extremes and of gross injustice--of oppression and
indifference to suffering. And so it will be until this materialism of
separation is repudiated: until we turn seriously to the belief that men
are truly brothers, not one of whom can be long happy while any other
suffers.
Come, Grandad, let us give up this God of Moses. Doubtless he was good
enough for the early Jews, but man has always had to make God in his own
image, and you and I need a better one, for we both surpass this one in
all spiritual values--in love, in truth, in justice, in common decency--as
much as Jesus surpassed the unrepentant thief at his side. Remember that
an honest, fearless search for truth has led to all the progress we can
measure over the brutes. Why must it lose the soul?
BERNAL.
(From the Reverend Allan Delcher to Bernal Linford.)
My boy, I shall not believe you are sane until I have seen you face to
face. I cannot believe you have fallen a victim to Universalism, which is
like the vale of Siddim, full of slime-pits. I am an old man, and my mind
goes haltingly, yet that is what I seem to glean from your rambling
screed. Come when you are through, for I must see you once more.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account