“Do you think,” asked Marian, “that an artist knows himself to be a great genius?” “I think,” I answered her, “that no man ever does a great thing unless he first believes he can do it. “You remember, I once said that to understand life well one must be creative, one must do things, because life is forever creating. And so the genius who is an artist, who has talent, who creates, by that very creation understands better than other men. He who can draw a thing sees it better than he who cannot.” “Yes,” said Virginia, “the fact that he can draw it proves that he sees it better.” “And in learning to draw it,” I went on, “he came to see it better.” “The great artist,” said Henry, “is one who expresses his idea perfectly.” “Then,” Virginia said, “I wonder if I will ever get to be a great artist. For the thing I draw is never the thing that was in my mind.” “Now,” said I, “you see the distinction between genius and talent. Genius is the power of understanding. Talent is the power of expression. A man may have very little to say, and yet say it wonderfully well. And another man may have much to say, and marvellous understanding of life, but not nearly so great power of expression. That is what Florence meant the other day, when she spoke of ‘Jenny Kissed Me,’ and of ‘Faust.’ But the man who expresses even the smallest thing well understands, at least, that thing. The power of expression itself implies understanding and a sense of unity and harmony. For no matter how well a man may be able to draw lines and objects, unless he understands composition—which is the knowledge of harmony and completeness—he cannot paint a good picture. And no matter how well a man may write English, however perfect his style may be, unless he understands something of life, of symmetry and structure, he cannot write a good book.” Henry said: “Poe expressed himself very well. Was he a genius?” “Now, stop,” I answered. “Don’t ask, ‘Was he a genius?’ Of course, he was that. We all have genius. The question is, how much?” “It seems to me,” said Henry, “that in some way Poe was as great as Shakespeare.” “Yes,” I said, “in some ways; and that is a very good example. Poe’s power of expression may have been as great in some ways as Shakespeare’s. But just think how immeasurably greater was Shakespeare’s genius, his understanding, and grasp of life!” “Poe, for instance,” said Henry, “was a great mathematician, and used his deductions in his stories.” The others told Henry this had nothing to do with his genius. They had a long talk on the relative genius—that is, understanding of life—of Poe and Hawthorne, and brought up many instances. Marian said: “Was Milton a great genius?” “What do you think?” I asked. “I suppose he was,” she said, “but I don’t think he had a great understanding of human life.” “Have you read ‘Paradise Lost’?” I asked her. “Yes,” she answered.