The Sense of TasteHollingworth, Harry L. (Harry Levi)
Science
The Sense of Taste
Hollingworth, Harry L. (Harry Levi)
Taste
“Of these five senses sight is held to be most precious and the best....
Hearing is a most excellent outward sense.... Taste is a necessary
sense.... Touch, the last and most ignoble of the senses, yet of as
great necessity as the others, and of as much pleasure.”
Contemporary phraseology and convention are just as eloquent in the
matter. There is common agreement that some of the senses, in their
exercise or consequences, are ennobling, dignified, pure, and worthy;
others, either in their exercise or consequences, are felt to be
degrading, debasing, vile, and iniquitous. An individual who revels in
impressions of sight and sound, and indulges to the utmost the raptures
afforded by the tones, melodies, concords, the colors and their
harmonies, and the elements of form, design, and arrangement, we are
likely to find classified by his associates as “sensitive,”
“temperamental,” “artistic.” But one who revels to the same or even much
less degree in the unholy impressions of contact, temperature, smell,
and taste is held to be “sensuous” rather than “sensitive,” “gluttonous”
rather than “temperamental,” and “vicious” rather than “artistic.” The
former pleasures minister to a “divine fire,” the latter only to “lust”
and “appetite.”
Similarly, we esteem in quite distinctive manner the workman whose craft
consists in the preparation and arrangement of sights and sounds in
pleasing elements, orders, and compositions. He is held to have
“acquired merit,” however unsuccessful his labors, and receives warm
social approbation. He is an “artist.” But the workman whose craft
consists in the preparation and presentation of acceptable sensations of
taste, smell, touch, and temperature, what of him? He is neither held to
have “acquired merit” nor to deserve any enviable amount of social
recognition. He is only a “cook,” a “chef,” or, at the most, a “chemist”
or a “dietitian.” Only in the comic supplements is he ever an “artist.”
Painting, for instance, is held to be an “art”; but cooking is only a
“service.” The one is rewarded by distinction and eminence, the other,
when rewarded at all, by wages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account