When the non-military Hindus, most of them unwilling converts, embraced
Muhammadanism, it was the custom in choosing their Islamic name to adopt
the prefix "Sheikh." Alma Ram became Sheikh Ali, for instance, and
Gobind Das Sheikh Zahur-ud-din. But the proud Rajput warriors were
unwilling to be classed with these. "We come of a fighting stock," they
argued, "like the Pathans. Our history is more glorious than theirs." So
they adopted the suffix "Khan," which with the man of genuine Muhammadan
ancestry implies Pathan descent. The Chohans, when they became
converted, were known to the Rajputs as the Kaim Khanis, or "the firm
and unbreakable ones." Every Ranghar, too, was be-khaned, and as a class
they have shown a martial spirit equal to the title.
The British officer in the Indian Cavalry swears by the Ranghars. I know
cavalry leaders who would unhesitatingly name him if asked in what breed
they considered there was the best makings of a sowar. He is born
horseman and horsemaster. And he is very much "a man." Even in the
Punjab, where there are collected the best fighting stocks in
India--that is to say, the best fighting stocks in the East--he is a
hero of romance. "You'll find the Ranghar," the Pirrhai tells us,
"In the drink shop, or in the jail,
On the back of a horse,
Or in the deep grave."
[Illustration: THE RANGHAR.]
I had heard that tag long before I met the Ranghar on service, and I
wanted to see how his dare-devil, undisciplined past--if indeed it was
as dare-devil as it is painted--served him on a campaign. The Ranghar,
one knows, is a Rajput by origin and a Muhammadan by faith. His
ancestors were brought to see eye to eye with the Mogul--a change of
vision due to no priestcraft, but dictated by the sword. It must be
remembered that their lands were exposed to the full tide of the Moslem
flood. The Rajputs who earned immortality by their defiance of Akbar,
the lions of Rajasthan, lived far from Delhi in the shelter of their
forests and hills. The vicinity of the Ranghars to the Mogul capital
helps to explain their submission; it does not explain the relative
virility and vitality of the breed to-day compared with their Hindu
Rajput contemporaries. It will be generally admitted, I think, that the
average Ranghar or Khaim Khani is a stouter man than the Rajput pure and
simple. Why this should be so; why the descendants of the unconverted
Rajputs who held by their faith should not produce as hard a breed of
men as the Rajputs who were the first to submit to Islam, and that under
compulsion, is a mystery unexplained. One does not set much store by
converts in the East. They are generally a yielding, submissive crew.
But the Ranghar is very decidedly "lord of himself," a man of action,
with something of the pagan in him perhaps, but no hidden corners in his
mind where sophistry can enter in and corrupt. The best answer I have
heard to the Hun Jehadist wile was given by a Ranghar.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account