The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the StatesFleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
History
The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the States
Fleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877); United States -- History -- 1865-1898
The lax election laws, framed indeed for the benefit of the party in
power, gave the radicals ample opportunity to control the negro vote.
The elections were frequently corrupt, though not a great deal of money
was spent in bribery. It was found less expensive to use other methods
of getting out the vote. The negroes were generally made to understand
that the Democrats wanted to put them back into slavery, but sometimes
the leaders deemed it wiser to state more concretely that "Jeff Davis
had come to Montgomery and is ready to organize the Confederacy again"
if the Democrats should win; or to say that "if Carter is elected, he
will not allow your wives and daughters to wear hoopskirts." In Alabama
many thousand pounds of bacon and hams were sent in to be distributed
among "flood sufferers" in a region which had not been flooded since the
days of Noah. The negroes were told that they must vote right and
receive enough bacon for a year, or "lose their rights" if they voted
wrongly. Ballot-box stuffing developed into an art, and each negro was
carefully inspected to see that he had the right kind of ticket before
he was marched to the polls.
The inspection and counting of election returns were in the hands of the
county and state boards, which were controlled by the governor, and
which had authority to throw out or count in any number of votes. On the
assumption that the radicals were entitled to all negro votes, the
returning boards followed the census figures for the black population in
order to arrive at the minimum radical vote. The action of the returning
boards was specially flagrant in Louisiana and Florida and in the black
counties of South Carolina.
Notwithstanding the fact that the very best arrangements had been made
at Washington and in the States for the running of the radical machine,
everywhere there were factional fights from the beginning. Usually the
scalawags declared hostilities after they found that the carpetbaggers
had control of the negroes and the inside track on the way to the best
state and federal offices. Later, after the scalawags had for the most
part left the radicals, there were contests among the carpetbaggers
themselves for the control of the negro vote and the distribution of
spoils. The defeated faction usually joined the Democrats. In Arkansas a
split started in 1869 which by 1872 resulted in two state governments.
Alabama in 1872 and Louisiana in 1874-75 each had two rival governments.
This factionalism contributed largely to the overthrow of the radicals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account