The Sermon on the Mount: A Practical ExpositionGore, Charles
Religion
The Sermon on the Mount: A Practical Exposition
Gore, Charles
Sermon on the mount
VI. _Thou shalt do no murder._ This commandment is developed by our
Lord so as to prohibit hatred or contempt in thought and word as well
as in deed. Translated from the negative into the positive it becomes
an injunction to do all that lies in one’s power to promote the life
of others, physically and spiritually――to “love thy neighbour as
thyself”――and to do this with a good will even towards enemies.
VII. _Thou shalt not commit adultery._ Our Lord deals with this
commandment partly by an increased strictness with regard to the
marriage law which brings under the head of adultery a number of
remarriages after divorce hitherto tolerated under the Jewish system;
partly by making the indulged intention to sin equally guilty with
the sin itself. On another occasion our Lord gives “adulteries,
fornications, lasciviousness,” a conspicuous place among the sins which
“proceed out of the heart” or “from within,” as though to emphasize the
necessity in regard to this class of sins in particular of cleansing
the inner springs of action and feeling. If we make the injunction
positive and general instead of negative and partial, we arrive at the
“law of liberty,” the duty of subordinating the flesh to the spirit, in
respect of eating and drinking, as well as of the sexual passions; and
the necessity of self-discipline or fasting as a means to that end (see
above, pp. 120 f.).
VIII. _Thou shalt not steal_, converted from the negative into
the positive, becomes “Thou shalt labour, working with thine hands
the thing that is good, that thou mayest have to give to him that
needeth.”[93] It is, in another form, the loving one’s neighbour as
oneself: the having the same care for his goods as for one’s own: the
same anxiety that he should have proper wages for labour as oneself.
From the Christian point of view this commandment is broken, not only
by stealing in the ordinary sense, but also (1) by fraudulent dealings
in business or trade, whereby our fellow man receives for money
given something less, or other, than he had a right to expect: (2) by
“sweating” or requiring others to work for inadequate wages: (3) by
giving or receiving bribes or, in other ways, defrauding an employer
of the best service of the employed: (4) by expecting others to work
for us without doing our own fair share of work: (5) by neglecting or
inadequately performing the duty of almsgiving. And in our generation
we specially need reminding that association in “companies” leaves
the moral responsibility for commercial dealings still resting on
each member of the company, at least in the form of a duty to vote for
directors who will have righteousness in view: to discountenance all
unrighteousness as far as possible: to refuse gains for unrighteous
dealing, when known. In all cases the Christian must prefer to suffer
wrong rather than to do it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account