The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
Of all kinds of animal food, pork was almost universally esteemed by
the ancients as the best. Hippocrates repeatedly speaks of it as being
most wholesome and nutritious, and Galen says the same of it in the
strongest language. He states that the athletæ, if for one day presented
with the same bulk of any other article of food, immediately experienced
a diminution of strength; and if the change of diet was persisted in
for several successive days, that they fell off in flesh. He adds that
he had been credibly informed by persons who had been compelled, under
extraordinary circumstances, to taste human flesh, that pork bears a
near resemblance to it. Celsus praises it for its lightness: “Inter
domesticas vero quadrupedes, levissima suilla est.” Aëtius, Oribasius,
and, in a word, all the Greek authorities subsequent to Galen, deliver
exactly the same character of it as he. See, in particular, Simeon Seth.
He says, that the flesh of swine a year old is the best, and that very
young pigs are not to be eaten, as being too humid and excrementitious.
He adds that the flesh of wild boars furnish the best food, being neither
so excrementitious nor so viscid as that of tame swine. Martial declares
his fondness for young pigs fed upon milk. The Arabian authors display
(as might be expected) their religious prejudices against the flesh of
swine. Avicenna merely remarks of it that the Christians, and those who
imitate them, say that the flesh of the wild boar is the best of all.
Averrhoes refers to the opinion of Avicenna. Rhases, who has treated
of Dietetics in three distinct works, has nowhere, so far as we can
discover, recommended pork as an article of food. Haly Abbas, however,
speaks favorably of it; he, it would appear, being a Magian. Various
receipts for dressing pork are given by Apicius. As a sauce for the flesh
of the wild boar, he recommends a composition of honey, pickle, sodden
wine, and raisin wine. The wild boar is mentioned as a favorite delicacy
of the Roman epicures by Juvenal and other writers of that age. Cato, the
Censor, gives very sensible directions for the preparation of ham. (De
Re Rusticâ, 162.) It will be perceived that our author states that pork
is imperspirable. Sanctorius confirms the truth of this statement. Both
Cicero and Porphyry quote the saying of Chrysippus, that a soul or living
principle was given to swine, as a sort of salt, to preserve their flesh
from putrefaction for the use of man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account