The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
All the authorities agree that the flesh of the stag or roe is difficult
to digest. Hence Rhases forbids it, except after hard exercise. Simeon
Seth adds that, as in summer, stags frequently eat poisonous serpents,
it may be dangerous to take of their flesh at that season. Celsus
appears to have had a more favorable opinion of venison than most of
the ancient authorities, for he ranks “omnis venatio” among the things
which agree best with the stomach. Seth says that hare is sufficiently
nutritious, if properly digested, but that it disagrees with persons
of a dry temperament, and is apt to form melancholic humours. The poet
Martial also praises it extravagantly. Apicius gives many complicated
receipts for dressing hares. Pliny remarks that there never is any fat on
hares. (Hist. Nat. xi, 85.) Hippocrates says that their flesh is dry and
astringent. Horace frequently praises the shoulder of the hare. (Sat. ii,
4, 44.) In our days, the loins are preferred. The cuniculus, or rabbit,
was greatly esteemed in Spain, but does not appear to have been much used
by the Greeks or Romans.
Galen says the ass was eaten in times of scarcity, but was not a regular
article of food. Xenophon, however, mentions, in the 1st book of the
‘Anabasis,’ that the flesh of the wild asses caught in the Syrian desert
was most delicious. Martial also speaks of the wild ass as being tender.
(Epigr. xiii, 97.)
SECT. LXXXV.—ON THE PARTS OF ANIMALS.
The extremities are tendinous, without fat and without flesh; and are
therefore viscid, contain little nourishment, and are laxative of the
belly, except those of birds owing to their great dryness. The snout and
ears are gristly and indigestible. The tongue is spongy, full of blood,
and gives little nourishment. The glands are sweet and friable; and those
of the breast are sweeter than the others, and, in particular, those of
swine which are giving milk. These are no less nutritious than the flesh.
The kidneys and testicles are strong-smelled and indigestible, but those
of cocks fed upon grain are sweet, and supply a good nourishment to the
body; whereas those of bulls, buck-goats, and rams are indigestible, and
contain bad juices. The brain produces phlegm, thick and bad chyme, is
difficult to evacuate and digest, injurious to the stomach, and occasions
nausea; but when properly digested it is sufficiently nutritious.
The marrow is oily and sweeter than the brain, but in other respects
resembles it. Fat and suet contain little nourishment, and are hurtful
to the stomach. The heart and liver contain thick juices, are difficult
to digest and evacuate. But the liver of swine is better. The spleen
contains bad juices, and occasions melancholic humours. The lungs are
more digestible as being spongy, but contain less nourishment and form
phlegm. The stomach, womb, and intestines are hard, indigestible, and
form phlegm. In general, the nourishment from wild animals is drier and
less excrementitious than that from tame.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account