The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
This, however, is an imperfect account of the action of poisons, whether
such as act by being introduced into the stomach, or those that prove
deleterious when applied to a wound. Perhaps the classification given by
Avicenna may be mentioned as the most complete of any proposed by the
ancient authorities. He states that poisons act either by some certain
quality, or by their whole substance. Of the former class some are
corrosive and putrefactive, like the lepus marinus; some inflammatory
and calefacient, like euphorbium; some frigorific and stupefying, like
opium; some prove obstruent of the respiratory passages, like litharge;
some act with their whole substance, as the wolf’s bane, and these
are the most deleterious of all. Of these some act upon one member in
particular, as cantharides upon the bladder, or the lepus marinus upon
the lungs, and some upon the whole body as opium. (iv, 6, 1.) Schulze, in
his ‘Toxicologia Veterum,’ has stated the ancient arrangement somewhat
differently, and we are at a loss to think what authors he has followed.
He says, the ancients arranged poisons according to their properties
into the frigorific (ψυκτικὰ), corrosive (διαβιβρώσκυντα), and septic
(σηπεδονώδη). The frigorific, he properly remarks, are those substances
now called narcotics; to which class, as Galen mentions, the conium,
poppy, henbane, and mandrake belong. On the action of narcotics, see
section xliii. Galen remarks that the human frame becomes habituated to
bear the action of these medicines without injury. He mentions the case
of an old Attic woman, who by little and little had accustomed herself to
take hemlock in any quantity. (De Simpl. iii.)
Avicenna states that the great indications of cure in all cases of
poisoning are to comfort and rouse the vital heat, and to resolve
(neutralize?) or expel the poison. When the poison is distributed over
the system, his remedies are venesection, purging, and the like. He
states decidedly that the proper time for venesection is either when
the poison is distributed over the body, more especially when it is in
a plethoric state, or when the poison is a substance not likely to be
absorbed. His other remedies are such as expel the poison from the body,
namely, emetics and sudorifics, or such as prevent it from entering the
system, namely, ligatures to the extremities, prohibiting sleep, applying
cupping instruments, or leeches, sucking the wound, amputation of the
limb, using actual and potential cauteries, and keeping the wound long
open. Upon the whole the general remedies recommended by him and the
other Arabians are little different from those of the Greeks, especially
of Dioscorides, who is the great authority upon theriacs.
Haly Abbas allows bleeding when the poison is distributed over the body,
and like the others also, makes mention of cupping with heat and of
amputation. He also joins in the general praise of the theriac.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account