The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
The upper eyelid undergoes adhesion sometimes to the lower tarsus,
sometimes to the tunica adnata, and sometimes to the cornea itself.
This disease obstructs the motions of the eye. Wherefore, applying an
ear-specillum to the broad margin of the eyelid, or stretching it with a
hook-like instrument, we free the adhesion with the scalpel used in the
operation for pterygia, taking care that the cornea be not wounded, lest
we give rise to procidentia. After the incision, having bathed the eye,
we separate the eyelids with tents, lest adhesion again take place, and
applying wool, soaked in an egg, after the third day we have recourse to
attenuant and healing collyria.
* * * * *
COMMENTARY. See Aëtius (vii, 66); Celsus (vii, 7); Albucasis (Chirurg.
ii, 15); Avenzoar (i, 8, 5); Avicenna (iii, 3, 8, 10); Haly Abbas (Pract.
ix, 22); Alsaharavius (Pract. iv, 5); Rhases (Cont. ii); Jesu Hali (ii,
7.)
The description given by Aëtius is exactly the same as our author’s.
Celsus correctly remarks that the disease is the consequence of neglected
ulcers. He describes the operation in the following terms:—“Igitur
aversum specillum inserendum deducendæque eo palpebræ sunt: deinde
exigua penicilla interponenda, donec exulceratio ejus loci finiatur.” He
mentions that Heraclides of Tarentum directed the eyelid to be dissected
from the white of the eye when there is adhesion between them; but
recommends us to do it cautiously with an averted specillum (dos de la
spathule, Fabr. d’Aquapen.), taking care to wound the eyelid rather than
the ball of the eye. Suitable ointments are afterwards to be applied.
Yet he says that he never saw a case thus cured; and states, that Meges
likewise thought the disease incurable.
In order to understand the above description of Celsus it may be useful
to give from Fabricius some account of the ancient specillum. “Il nous
suffit scauvoir que _specillum_ (qui est le mot Latin de Celse) est un
instrument long et rond, de cuivre, d’argent, ou de plomb, duquel on
sonde les fistules, ayant un de ses bouts plus large, et l’autre plus
étroit, en vulgaire Italien _stilo_.” (Œuv. Chir. ii.) It was, therefore,
a sort of sound.
Avenzoar directs us to make the separation by means of a golden rod or
probe, and then to apply the white of an egg broken with oil of roses
and oil of almonds. When the eyelid adheres to the white of the eye he
advises us in like manner to make the separation gently with a golden
spatula, and then to apply the oil of roses and of almonds. But the
latter case, he says, is difficult to cure.
Of the other Arabians, Albucasis and Haly Abbas evidently copy the
description of the operation given by Paulus; and Rhases and Avicenna
supply no additional information. Jesu Hali’s description is accurate,
but similar to that of Celsus.
SECT. XVI.—CHALAZIA OR TUMOURS RESEMBLING HAIL-STONES.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account