Crime -- England -- London -- History -- 19th century; London (England) -- Moral conditions; London (England) -- Social conditions
that the teetotaler should have his “comic reciter;” nor can there be a
question as to the possibility of being as funny, as hilarious even, over
a cup of wholesome, harmless tea as over the grog-glass. But I very much
doubt if any but total abstainers could appreciate some of the witticisms
that, according to the book in question, occasionally issue from the
mouths of babes and sucklings. Here is a sample:
“A CHILD’S ACUMEN.—‘Pa, does wine make a beast of a man?’
‘Pshaw, child, only once in a while!’
‘Is that the reason why Mr. Goggins has on his sign—Entertainment for
man and beast?’
‘Nonsense, child, what makes you ask?’
‘Because ma says that last night you went to Goggins’s _a man_, and
came back _a beast_! and that he entertained you.’
‘That’s mother’s nonsense, dear! Run out and play; papa’s head
aches!’”
I may have a preposterous aversion to a development of cuteness of a
certain sort in children, but I must confess that it would not have
pained me much had the above brilliant little anecdote concluded with a
reference to something else being made to ache besides papa’s head.
Again: “Two little boys attended a temperance meeting at Otley in
Yorkshire, and signed a pledge that they should not touch nor give strong
drink to anyone. On going home, their father ordered them to fetch some
ale, and gave them a can for the purpose. They obeyed; but after getting
the ale neither of them felt inclined to carry it; so they puzzled
themselves as to what they could do. At last they hit upon an expedient.
A long broom-handle was procured, and slinging the can on this, each took
one end of the broom-handle, and so conveyed the liquor home without
spilling it.”
One realty cannot see what moral lesson is to be deduced from these two
“funny” teetotal stories, unless it is intended to show that, from the
lofty eminence of total abstinence, a child may with impunity look down
upon and “chaff” and despise his beer-drinking parent. It would rather
seem that too early an indulgence in teetotal principles is apt to have
an effect on the childish mind quite the reverse of humanising. Here is
still another instance quoted from the “smart-saying” pages:
“Two poor little children attending a school in America, at some
distance from their home, were shunned by the others because their
father was a drunkard. The remainder at dinner-time went into the
playground and ate their dinner; but the poor twins could only look
on. If they approached near those who were eating, the latter would
say, ‘You go away; your father is a drunkard.’ But they were soon
taught to behave otherwise; and then it was gratifying to see how
delicate they were in their attention to the two little
unfortunates.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account