Crime -- England -- London -- History -- 19th century; London (England) -- Moral conditions; London (England) -- Social conditions
It need only be mentioned, in proof of the popularity enjoyed by these
“specs,” that within a fortnight afterwards a similar scene was enacted
at the same public-house. A detective went to the Bedford Arms, where he
heard that a distribution of prizes was to be made. He went into the
club-room. The managers were there, with about forty prizeholders. A
person produced a ticket and handed it to one of the directors, who,
after examining it, said “All right,” and paid the money—405_l._—which
consisted of cheques, notes, and gold. The holder of the prize got
405_l._ for a 500_l._ prize, it being supposed all the tickets were not
sold, and a reduction was made in proportion. About forty prizes were
given away in this manner during the evening. After the prizes were
drawn, each person was asked to put something in the bowl for the two
boys.
The prisoners were committed for trial, but were lucky enough to escape
punishment. For years they had been defying the law, and feathering
their nests on the strength of the silly confidence reposed in them by
the thousands of dupes who ran after their precious “specs;” and the
sentence of the judge was in effect no more severe than this—it bade them
beware how they so committed themselves for the future. Of course the
released lottery-agents promised that they _would_ beware, and doubtless
they will. Without being called on to do so, they even volunteered an
act of noble generosity. As before stated, the police had found in their
possession and seized a large sum of money—fourteen hundred pounds. This
the good gentlemen of the lottery suggested might be distributed amongst
the charities of that parish their leader honoured with his residence,
and with the Recorder’s sanction, and amid the murmured plaudits of a
crowded court, the suggestion was adopted. The oddest part of the
business was, however, that the benevolent gentlemen gave away what
didn’t belong to them, the fourteen hundred pounds representing the many
thousand shillings the believers in “specs” had intrusted to their
keeping. However, everybody appeared to think that the discharged
“speculators” had behaved honourably, not to say nobly, and there the
case ended.
The “spec” bubble exploded, the police authorities show symptoms of
bringing the machinery of the law to bear on a wider-spread and more
insidious mischief of the same breed. With the betting infatuation there
has naturally sprung up a swarm of knowing hungry pike ready to take
advantage of it. These are the advertising tipsters, the “turf
prophets,” and the “betting commissioners.” Driven from the streets,
where for so long they publicly plied their trade, they have resorted to
the cheap sporting press to make known their amiable intentions and
desires, and the terms on which they are still willing, even from the
sacred privacy of their homes, to aid and counsel all those faint-hearted
ones who despair of ruining themselves soon enough without such friendly
help.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account