“I am talking about the force we use in moving this pencil, and to some
extent in affecting your thought,” she continued, when Mr. Kendal had
mentioned certain recent scientific experiments of which he had read.
“The scientists have long associated the power of thought with the brain,
and have seriously argued that, as we could not be seen, measured,
weighed, or condensed, we did not exist. We do. And we have a force at
our command that cannot be explained, as yet. It can only occasionally
be demonstrated as clearly as this. Electricity is the most likely to
impress the man in the street as a comparison, but to argue from that as
a premise would lead to misconception. At present, it must be accepted as
a recognized but not understood force, only dimly perceived, as for years
electricity was.”
“Does it help, if we emphasize what we know of static electricity, as
well as thinking of the comparison in terms of electric current? A static
force in your plane, perhaps?”
“Yes, that helps; but the static force is in your plane, quite as much
as here. We have more knowledge of the current, to continue the simile,
but encounter static conditions both here and there, as well as counter
currents here.”
This would seem to offer reasons—in addition to David Bruce’s explanation
of the difficulties of translation when the messenger’s reaction to
certain word-symbols fails—for occasional delays in the transmission of
these communications.
“Margaret hasn’t tried us yet with an antagonistic force on your plane,”
she said, on another occasion. “We don’t do it this way when the forces
there are not harmonious.”
“Is your forward sight much greater than ours?” her husband asked. “Or is
it, in relation to other planes, about what ours is in regard to yours?”
“We can see the end as you have not even dreamed it yet, but our detailed
knowledge is limited to two or three planes beyond ours. Even here,
development is uneven, and some of us see farther than others. We are
far from omniscient or omnipotent. We have advanced beyond you, our
individual purposes are clear where yours are confused, we know where we
are bound and why, we see much farther ahead than you can, and we work
in three planes—yours as teachers, ours as laborers, and the next as
students.”
Referring to the statements about Russia, of which we had told him,
he asked whether there were the same relative differences of opinion
and judgment among them as among us, as to psychological policies to
be pursued for the Great Purpose, and as to the applications of those
policies on this plane.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account