After another delay, when the pencil wandered lightly and aimlessly,
she wrote: “Lenroot.” Supposing that she had finished, I put the pencil
aside, but she summoned me again, to add: “Lenroot elected by latest
count. Close in some places. We consider him elected.” Cass looked at his
watch. It was five minutes past twelve.
The next morning our papers announced Mr. Lenroot in the lead, with final
returns not yet received, and not until Cass reached his office did we
discover how truly “exclusive” our information had been. He learned
then that the suburban editions of several New York City papers, which
probably went to press about the time we talked to Mary K., practically
conceded the election to Mr. Davies, reporting him ahead by returns then
available.
Of many other specific statements that were either absolutely correct,
or so nearly correct that Mr. Kendal’s theory of a difference of
perceptive method might easily account for the error, one is notable.
On Sunday, May 19th, I asked Mary K. whether she could tell me anything
about the projected German drive.
“Yes. It will be fierce, but futile. All forces here see her doom, and
the war will last only as long as unsupported human endeavor can endure
against eternal purpose. Germany has no ally here. The forces that have
impelled her for these many years are overpowered by world-purpose, and
have left Germany to her destruction, while they prepare to destroy the
finest spiritual fruits of victory.”
Similarly, while writing to friends at the front of our entire confidence
in the outcome of the Picardy drive then in progress, May 30th, I paused
to ask Mary K. whether she had anything more to say about the war.
“Only that we are the victors. Germany does not win this drive, either.
Our forces rally, and the end is near. Defeat this time will leave them
despairing and afraid.”
To this Maynard Holt added, “All the forces have withstood the blow and
gather for the final and decisive defeat of Germany.”
VI
The actual existence of intelligent, invisible forces, constantly doing
battle for and against spiritual progress, through possession of what
we are wont to call our souls, was at first difficult for me to accept
literally, the idea being in direct opposition to my whole mental
tendency. While the theory was interesting, it seemed hardly credible
in its specific, individual application. However, I was soon given a
manifestation of the strength and pertinacity of the disintegrating
forces, which—although it ultimately strengthened my conviction, proving
highly corroborative—threatened for a time to end this effort, as far as
I was concerned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account