The Seventy's Course in Theology, First Year: Outline History of the Seventy and A Survey of the Books of Holy ScriptureRoberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Religion
The Seventy's Course in Theology, First Year: Outline History of the Seventy and A Survey of the Books of Holy Scripture
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Latter Day Saint churches -- Doctrines
"The time and place of writing was at Ephesus, as is generally held,
not long before the death of the Apostle, and probably at the request
of Christians in that city, Ch. xxi: 24 ('And we know that this
testimony is true') suggests that others desired to attest the truth
of the record as coming from the Apostle. This late date, nearly a
generation after the writing of the other Gospels, shows that the
leading facts about Jesus were already known to Christians. This
Gospel is therefore, in a certain sense, supplementary; but there is
no evidence that it was intended to supply omissions in the other
narratives. The design is stated in the book itself, and the many
events and discourses found only in this Gospel are in accordance with
it." (Bible Treasury, p. 129).
5. _The Purpose of John's Gospel:_ Contradictory opinions obtain
concerning the purpose for which the Apostle John wrote his account of
the gospel. Eusebius quotes Clement of Alexandria as saying that John,
perceiving that the bodily influence of Jesus had been made known in
the Gospels, (i. e., supposedly Matthew, Mark and Luke), and being
at the same time urged by his friends and borne along by the spirit,
wrote a spiritual Gospel (third century). A still earlier authority,
the unknown author of the so-called Muratorian Fragment (See Apostolic
Fathers, Rev. George A. Jackson, p. 186), which most scholars agree
belongs to the second century and probably not later than A. D. 170, so
far agrees with the idea that John's Gospel was intended to supplement
the other Gospels as to say, that when John's fellow-disciples and
bishops exhorted him to write, he said: "Fast along with me three days
from today, and let us relate the one to the other whatever has been
revealed to us. The same night it was revealed to Andrew, the Apostle,
that "John should in his own name, write down the whole, and that they
all should revise" what he wrote. Another contention is, and this is
based on the authority of Irenaeus (third century) that John wrote to
controvert the errors of the Nicholaitanes and Cerinthus, in other
words, that "his aim was not so much supplementary as polemical." In
the midst of the conflicting theories it is just as well that we accept
the simple and straight-forward statement of St. John himself in the
last chapter but one of his famous Gospel as to the purpose for which
he wrote his Gospel, namely, "And many other signs truly did Jesus in
the presence of his disciples which are not written in this book; but
these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the
Son of God; and that, believing, ye might have life through his name."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account