The Seventy's Course in Theology, First Year: Outline History of the Seventy and A Survey of the Books of Holy ScriptureRoberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Religion
The Seventy's Course in Theology, First Year: Outline History of the Seventy and A Survey of the Books of Holy Scripture
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Latter Day Saint churches -- Doctrines
As an illustration of this indispensable framework, Pittenger, whom I
before quoted, gives the following illustrations from Shakespeare:
"Among the many speeches found in Shakespeare, the existence of these
three essential parts may easily be noted. The funeral speeches over
the dead body of Julius Caesar afford an excellent example. The merit
of the orations of Brutus and Antony are very unequal, but both are
instructive. We will analyze them in turn. Brutus speaks first. He
shows his want of appreciation of the true nature of persuasive
eloquence by declaring that this will be an advantage. His introduction
is also too long and elaborate for the work he has in hand. The central
thought with which he opens is in substance, "I am worthy of your
closest attention." This cannot be considered a fortunate beginning,
and it would have been fatal for any one less highly esteemed by the
people than "the well-beloved Brutus." He says:
BRUTUS' SPEECH--INTRODUCTION.
'Romans, countrymen, and lovers! hear me for my cause, and be silent
that you may hear; believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine
honor that you may believe; censure me in your wisdom, and awake your
senses that you may the better judge.'
"This introduction is a master-piece of Shakespeare's art, because
it pictures so well the character of Brutus in his dignity and blind
self-confidence; but for Brutus it is unfortunate, because it puts him
on the defensive and makes the people his judges. He must now plead
well, or they will condemn him. In the discussion (following) the
thought simply is, 'I was Caesar's friend, and therefore you may well
believe that I would not have killed him if he had not deserved death
because of his ambition.' This is the whole argument, and it is weak
because it does not prove the ambition of Caesar, or show that ambition
on Caesar's part was a crime which Brutus had a right to punish with
death. The antithetic sentences lack both logic and passion. As they
touch neither head nor heart, they can have but slight and momentary
effect. Notice the discussion as an example of fine words which do not
serve their purpose.
THE DISCUSSION.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account