[22] We must not ignore the fact, that other distinguished anthropologists, such as Manouvrier, Pearson, Frassetto, and especially Giuffrida-Ruggieri, have recently contested the slighter variability and the infantile character of woman. _Cf._ Giuffrida-Ruggieri, “Anthropological Considerations regarding Infantilism, and Conclusions regarding the Origin of the Varieties of the Human Species” (_Italian Zoological Review_, 1903, vol. xiv., Nos. 4, 5). _Cf._ also the interesting remarks of Näcke in the “German Archives for Criminal Anthropology,” 1903, vol. xiii., pp. 292, 293. [23] Konrad Lange--“Das Wesen der Kunst” (“The Nature of Art”), pp. 361-364; Berlin, 1901--has ably exposed the subjective grounds of this ancient dispute, and has shown their untenability. CHAPTER V PSYCHICAL DIFFERENTIAL SEXUAL CHARACTERS--THE WOMAN’S QUESTION (Appendix: SEXUAL SENSIBILITY IN WOMAN) “_Among all the higher activities and movements of our time, the struggle of our sisters to attain an equality of position with the strong, the dominant, the oppressive sex, appears to me, from the purely human point of view, most beautiful and most interesting; indeed, I regard it as possible that the coming century will obtain its historical characterization, not from any of the social and economical controversies of the world of men, but that this century will be known to subsequent history distinctively as that in which the solution of the ‘woman’s question’ was obtained._”--GEORG HIRTH. CONTENTS OF CHAPTER V