The Sexual Life of Our Time in Its Relations to Modern Civilization: Translated from the Sixth German EditionBloch, Iwan
Philosophy
The Sexual Life of Our Time in Its Relations to Modern Civilization: Translated from the Sixth German Edition
Bloch, Iwan
Sex; Sexual ethics
=To a large extent men first learned from women the elements of the
various handicrafts.= For instance, as Mason says, primeval woman gave
her “ulu”[27] to the saddler, and taught him the mode of preparing
leather. Women were the first discoverers of numerous industries and
handicrafts. The further development of these in later times was the
work of men; men alone understood how to differentiate their work, while
from the first it was inevitable that motherhood should greatly limit
the working powers of woman.
In the middle ages there still existed in Europe, especially in Germany
and France, certain industries which were exclusively in the hands of
women--for instance, the silk-spinners, silk-weavers, tailoresses, and
girdle-makers. In all these occupations there were mistresses, maids,
and female apprentices. It was not until the sixteenth century that
manufactures became a monopoly of the male sex. In the eighteenth
century women were actually forbidden by law to take part in
manufactures, until in recent times a reaction in their favour took
place.
Therefore we must not from the present conditions judge the capacity of
women for practical activity outside the home. I quite agree with
Gerland, who assumes that during this oppression of the female sex for
thousands of years, a certain deteriorating influence must have been
exercised, and I agree also with Havelock Ellis, who hopes much from the
development in the civilization of the future of an equal freedom for
man and woman, and who demands that we should acquire experience by
unlimited experiment regarding the qualifications of the female sex for
all departments of activity. Golden words as to the necessity for a
comprehensive emancipation of woman were uttered in 1865 by the
celebrated anthropologist Thomas Huxley, in his essay on
“Emancipation--Black and White,” in which he strongly condemns the
present system for the education of girls:
“Let us have ‘sweet girl graduates’ by all means. They will be none
the less sweet for a little wisdom; and the ‘golden hair’ will not
curl less gracefully outside the head by reason of there being brains
within. Nay, if obvious practical difficulties can be overcome, let
those women who feel inclined to do so descend into the gladiatorial
arena of life, not merely in the guise of _retiariæ_, as heretofore,
but as bold _sicariæ_, breasting the open fray. Let them, if they so
please, become merchants, barristers, politicians. Let them have a
fair field, but let them understand, as the necessary correlative,
that they are to have no favour. Let Nature alone sit high above the
lists, ‘rain influence and judge the prize.’”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account