The Shakespeare-Expositor: An Aid to the Perfect Understanding of Shakespeare's PlaysKeightley, Thomas
General
The Shakespeare-Expositor: An Aid to the Perfect Understanding of Shakespeare's Plays
Keightley, Thomas
Drama -- Outlines, syllabi, etc.; Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Outlines, syllabi, etc.
"Achievement is command; ungain'd beseech."
Nothing can be more correct than this; yet some approve of Mr.
Harness's correction, _Achieved men_. 'Ungain'd' sc. men, are those who
have not gained, achieved. In Corneille's Polyeucte (i. 3), Pauline
makes the very same remark.
* * * * *
"Then though my heart's content firm love doth bear."
For 'Then' of the 4tos the folio reads 'That,' another instance of the
confusion of these words. (See note on Prol.) The folio also reads
'contents.'
* * * * *
SC. 3. "Princes * * * * * *"
The remainder of the line has evidently been omitted or effaced; for
speeches never begin thus abruptly. We might read _and leaders of the
Grecian host_.
* * * * *
"With those of nobler bulk * * *"
We might add, _and greater strength_.
* * * * *
"And flies fled under shade," etc.
Here 'flies' is either a verb or a noun; if the former, we have the
grotesque image of the wind running and hiding itself after doing
mischief; if the latter, as in the folio, alluding to 'the brize,' we
have a bathos unworthy of any poet. Something, then, must have been
lost between 'flies' and 'fled.' I read thus:--
"And flies _along the sky, while bird and beast are_
Fled under shade;"
and I fancy I have made a near approach to what the poet wrote. As he
was reading Chaucer at that time, he may have had in his mind:--
"Ne how the _beestes_ and the _briddes_ alle
_Fledden_ for feare when the wood was falle."
Knt's. Tale.
If nothing is lost, we should read '_have_ fled.'
* * * * *
"Retires to chiding Fortune."
For 'Retires' Pope, whom I have followed, read _Returns_, Hanmer
_Replies_, Dyce _Retorts_. Yet the text may be right, and 'Retires' be
the French _retire_, shoots again, returns the shot.
* * * * *
"Speak, Prince of Ithaca, and be it of less expect."
This is not sense. I read _'we_ it less.' The superfluous insertion of
_of_ was not infrequent (see on Meas. for Meas. iv. 4). Here, however,
it was manifestly introduced to make some kind of sense. See Introd. p.
67.
* * * * *
"But for these instances * * *"
We might add, _which now I'll show you_.
* * * * *
"And look! how many Grecian tents [do] stand hollow
Upon this plain so many hollow factions.
When that the general is not as the hive."
'Do' was evidently introduced to eke out the verse. We should perhaps
read 'general'_s_' sc. tent.
* * * * *
"Degrees being vizarded,
The unworthiest shows as fairly in the mask."
As what? A line seems to be lost.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account