The Short ConstitutionWade, Martin J. (Martin Joseph)
History
The Short Constitution
Wade, Martin J. (Martin Joseph)
United States. Constitution
“The grand jury is to investigate the cases of those who have been
arrested and held under preliminary information on oath by private
accusers; and it may also investigate cases of supposed crime of
which it has knowledge or to which its attention may be called by
the public prosecuting officer. Its proceedings are secret and its
members are sworn not to subsequently divulge them.”—McClain’s
_Constitutional Law_.
62 Constitution of the United States, Amendment V.
“The rule of procedure generally recognized is that when an accused
person has been put on trial under a valid indictment in a court
having jurisdiction of the case, and a jury has been empaneled and
sworn to try the case and give a verdict, and a verdict of _not
guilty_ is given—the accused cannot be again put on trial for the
same crime, or any included crime for which he might have been
convicted in that prosecution.”—_Cyclopedia of American Government_,
Vol. II, p. 251.
“A verdict of not guilty is conclusive and the defendant must be
discharged. If however he is convicted, he may in some instances
appeal the case to a higher court for review and that is not being
again put in jeopardy.”—Emlin McClain, quoted in the _Cyclopedia of
American Government_, Vol II, p. 251.
“Jeopardy is complete when the court proceeds with a jury to
ascertain the defendant’s guilt.”
“As the criminal jurisdiction of the Federal Court extends only to
offenses against the Federal laws, and no prosecution for such
offenses can be entertained in the state courts—it follows that
there can be no questions of former jeopardy as between a federal
and a state court.”—_Cyclopedia of American Government_, Vol II, p.
251.
63 Constitution of the United States, Amendment V.
In our own early colonies persons were frequently tortured to compel
them to give evidence against themselves or against other people,
but at that time the colonies were still under British authority.
An instance was recently reported of a man appearing before a
sheriff and confessing to the commission of five different murders
in as many different places in a western State. Upon investigation
it was found that murders had been committed in these places about
the time he confessed to having committed the crimes, so he was
arrested and held by the sheriff. Upon further investigation it was
discovered that he was mentally unbalanced and having read of all
these crimes he imagined he had committed them. He was released from
arrest and was committed to a hospital for the insane. In this
instance an innocent man might have been executed if his own
testimony had been sufficient to convict him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account