The Siberian Overland Route from Peking to Petersburg,: Through the Deserts and Steppes of Mongolia, Tartary, &c.Michie, Alexander
History
The Siberian Overland Route from Peking to Petersburg,: Through the Deserts and Steppes of Mongolia, Tartary, &c.
Michie, Alexander
China -- Description and travel; Siberia (Russia) -- Description and travel
Russia was held by a tenure more suitable to the nomad habits of the
Mongols. Armies had to be maintained, and the khans of the Golden
Horde found occupation in keeping down the Russian princes. They
therefore held their supremacy in Europe, until they did the work of
their enemies by quarrelling amongst themselves, but their yoke was
not finally shaken off till the fifteenth century.
Before the empires founded by the family of Genghis had been wholly
broken up, another great Mongol conqueror appeared in the person of
Timour, or Tamerlane. Born under happier auspices, and brought up
in contact with more civilised people, Timour added to the native
ferocity and the ambition of universal empire of his ancestors, the
arts and some of the refinements of education. He was, moreover,
a zealous Mahommedan, and drew from the Koran encouragements in
his career of conquest, and excellent moral maxims which seemed
in strange contrast with his life. In a military point of view,
Timour's life was a brilliant success. Before his death he placed
twenty-seven crowns on his head; he conquered India, and boasted
that he had penetrated northwards to the region of perpetual day.
His conquests outstripped those of Alexander. "On the eastern bank
of the Hyphasis, on the edge of the Desert, the Macedonian hero
halted and wept; the Mogul entered the desert, reduced the fortress
of Batnir, and stood in arms before Delhi."[16] He captured Delhi,
and "purified his soldiers in the blood of the idolaters." Timour,
when he was seventy years old, resolved to re-conquer China, from
which country the family of Genghis had been recently expelled.
He despatched his armies from Samarcand for the expedition, but he
himself died on the way, in 1405, and his empire fell to pieces
through the incapacity of his sons.
[16] Gibbon, vol. ix. p. 10.
Timour had perhaps the honour of shedding more blood than any of
his predecessors; but, like them, he was incapable of governing
what he had conquered. His boast that a child might carry a purse
of gold from the east to the west, could be justified only on the
supposition that he had pacified Asia by making it a solitude.
He was considered a usurper by the Mongols of his day. He made
war on his own people because they were idolaters; yet the modern
Mongols worship him, beguiling their long evenings in their tents by
chanting invocations to his memory.
The next great Mongol who left his mark on the world was Timour's
great-grandson Baber, who conquered Delhi in 1528, and founded
there the dynasty of the Great Mogul. But Baber was ashamed of his
descent, and despised the Mongol character. It was probably to his
throwing off the barbarism of his ancestors, that his family owed
the permanence of their Indian empire. The last scion of this royal
house died in misery at Rangoon, in 1862.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account