The Silent Watchers: England's Navy during the Great War: What It Is, and What We Owe to ItCopplestone, Bennet
History
The Silent Watchers: England's Navy during the Great War: What It Is, and What We Owe to It
Copplestone, Bennet
Great Britain. Royal Navy; World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations
1916, “confirmed the old truth that the large fighting ship, the ship
which combines the maximum of strength in attack and defence, rules the
seas.” They do not claim that the English superiority in strength—which
they place at “roughly two to one”—was sensibly reduced by our losses
in the battle, nor that the large English fighting ships—admittedly
larger, more numerous, and more powerfully gunned than their own—ceased
after Jutland to rule the seas. The German claim, critically considered,
is simply that in the circumstances it was a very lucky escape for the
German ships. And so indeed it was. It left them with the means of
securing their bases from which could be carried on the U-boat warfare
against our mercantile communications at sea.
When the day arrives for the veil which at present enshrouds naval
operations to be lifted, and details can be discussed freely and
frankly, a whole literature will grow up around the Battle of the
Giants. Strategically, I repeat—even at the risk of becoming
tedious—it was a great success, both in its inception and in its
practical results. Tactically its success was not complete. The Falkland
Islands and Coronel actions were by comparison simple affairs of which
all essential details are known. Jutland, from six o’clock in the
evening of May 31st until dawn upon June 1st, when the opposing fleets
had completely lost touch, the one with the other, is a puzzling
confusing business which will take years of discussion and of
elucidation wholly to resolve—if ever it be fully resolved. If any one
be permitted to describe the three actions in a few words apiece one
would say that Coronel was both strategically and tactically a brilliant
success for the Germans. Von Spee concentrated his squadron outside the
range of our observation, placed himself in a position of overwhelming
tactical advantage, and won a shattering victory. At the Falkland
Islands action we did to von Spee exactly what he had done to us at
Coronel. This time it was the English concentration which was effected
outside the German observation, and it was the German squadron which was
wiped out when the tactical clash came. The first two phases of Jutland
were, in spite of our serious losses in ships, notable tactical
successes; they ended with Beatty round the head of the German Fleet and
Jellicoe deployed in masterly fashion between Beatty and Evan-Thomas.
Then we get the exasperating third phase, in which the honours of
skilful evasion rest with the Germans, and the fourth or night phase,
during which confusion became worse confounded until all touch was lost.
And yet, in spite of the tactical failure of the third and fourth
phases, the battle as a whole was so great a success that it left us
with an unchallengeable command of the sea—a more complete command than
even after Trafalgar. The Germans learned that they could not fight us
in the open with the smallest hope of success. One of the direct fruits
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account