The Silent Watchers: England's Navy during the Great War: What It Is, and What We Owe to ItCopplestone, Bennet
History
The Silent Watchers: England's Navy during the Great War: What It Is, and What We Owe to It
Copplestone, Bennet
Great Britain. Royal Navy; World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations
I had listened with the keenest interest to this interchange, for though
I should not myself have ventured to comment upon so technical a subject
as naval gunnery, I had subconsciously felt what the old Salt Horse had
so bluntly and almost brutally expressed.
“We have arrived, then, at this,” observed I, slowly, “that during the
first hour, up to the turn when the main High Seas Fleet joined up with
Hipper’s battle cruisers, our squadrons got the worst of it, though they
were of twice Fritz’s numbers and of far more than twice his strength.
It is a beastly thing for an Englishman to say, but really you leave me
no choice. Though I hate whisky, I must follow the example set by my
betters.”
The Master Gunner laughed. “In the Service,” said he, “we learn from our
mistakes. At the beginning we did badly on May 31st, but afterwards we
profited by the lesson. What more could you ask? . . . Civilians,” said
he, aside to his colleagues, “seem to think that only English ships
should be allowed to have guns or to learn how to use them.”
“Now we have given Fritz his due,” said I, “let us get on to the second
part of the battle, Act Two of the naval drama. You will agree that the
handling of our damaged squadrons by Beatty and Evan-Thomas was
magnificent, and that the execution done by us was fully up to the best
English standards?”
“Yes,” replied the grim Salt Horse, to whom I had specially appealed.
“We will allow both. Beatty’s combination of dash and caution was beyond
praise and the gunnery was excellent.”
“None of our ships were sunk, none were seriously hit,” put in the
Gunner. “On the other hand we certainly sank one German battle cruiser
and one battleship, and very heavily damaged others. I don’t know how
many. I think that we must accept as proved that not many German ships
of the battle line were sunk in any part of the action. When badly hit
they fell out and retired towards home, which they could always do.
During the second part both fleets were steaming away from the German
bases, so that a damaged enemy ship had only to stop to be left behind
in safety. A good many ships were claimed by our officers as sunk when
they were known to have been damaged and had disappeared; but I feel
sure that most of them had fallen out, not been sunk.”
“The outstanding feature,” cried the Maker of Guns, “was the superiority
of our gunnery. We have always encouraged individuality in gun laying,
and have never allowed Fire Control to supersede the eyes and hands of
the skilled gun-layers in the turrets. Control and individual laying are
with us complementary, not mutually exclusive. With the Germans an
intensely mechanical control is of the essence of their system. They are
very good up to a point, but have not elasticity enough to deal with the
perpetual variations of range and direction when fighting ships are
moving fast and receiving heavy punishment. Fritz beat us in the first
part, but we, as emphatically, beat him in the second.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account