The Silver Domino; Or, Side Whispers, Social and LiteraryCorelli, Marie
General
The Silver Domino; Or, Side Whispers, Social and Literary
Corelli, Marie
English essays -- 19th century; Literature -- Criticism and interpretation; Satire
Think of it, Rudyard! think of it! Art ready to cope with Phill? Wilt
meet Potts on his own ground? Deem not thyself Eden's superior, for
he "understands," according to the _Athenæum_, "proportion, contrast,
balance, and the value of unhalting movement," things that inferior
persons like Scott, Thackeray, Balzac, and others had to study all
their lives long. Moreover, another journal dictatorially announces
that "novel-readers must prepare to welcome" Phillpotts. Mark that
"must"! That "must" would fain seize the Ass-public by the throat,
and make it eat Phillpotts like a turnip. But the Ass is a fastidious
ass sometimes--it likes to nose its food before devouring; it will
nose Phillpotts at its pleasure. Meantime, it is nosing thee, friend
Kipling, dubiously and with a faint touch of derision. Ridicule kills;
beware of it, my boy. And to avoid ridicule and secure dignity,
hist!--a side-whisper, meant kindly--_Put down your Boom business!_
Stamp it out. Hush it up. If you don't take my advice you'll regret it.
The thing has been over-done. You have had more friends than are good
for you; a few stanch foes would have brought you much more benefit
in the long run. When your ill-advised flatterers quote your jingly
"Barrack-Room Ballads" as though they were things immortal--when good
Frank Harris, of _Fortnightly_ prowess, imposes a growling recital of
scraps of your doggerel, "Fuzzy-wuz," on patiently-bored people sitting
at a social meal, with the air of one considering it a finer production
than "The Isles of Greece," or Shelley's "Cloud"--we say with Hamlet,
"Somewhat too much of this." In the year of grace 1900 "Barrack-Boom
Ballads" will have gone the way of all "occasional verse," and not a
line will remain in the memory of the public. The English people know
perfectly well what poetry is, and no critic will ever persuade them
that you can write it. At the same time no one wishes to deny your
surface cleverness or your literary ability. You are on the same rank
with Bret Harte, Frank Harris, Frank Stockton, Anstey, and a host of
others, and there is no objection taken to your standing along with
these; but there is objection, honest objection, made to your being
forced higher aloft than your compeers, by means of a ridiculously
exaggerated, aggressively ubiquitous "boom." When Walter of the
_Times_ rushed frantically into a court of law about his copyright in
a Kipling article (he having taken no such heed of any other author's
article till then), the outside public laughed and shrugged their
shoulders at the absurdity of the thing. From the fuss made, one would
have imagined that God Himself read the _Times_ every morning, and was
particularly interested in Kipling. This sort of nonsense never lasts.
The reaction infallibly sets in. Never was a name sent up sky-high
like a rocket, but it did not fall plump down like a stick. And so,
excellent Rudyard, beware! You are not "the greatest English author" by
a long way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account