The Singing Church: The Hymns It Wrote and SangLorenz, Edmund S. (Edmund Simon)
Religion
The Singing Church: The Hymns It Wrote and Sang
Lorenz, Edmund S. (Edmund Simon)
Hymns -- History and criticism
So many versions of individual Psalms make such satisfactory hymns and
so many hymns are such faithful transcripts of passages from the
Psalms, or echoes of their sentiments, that the distinction between
psalm versions and hymns in individual cases might well be set aside
entirely, as having no actual basis or value.
V. WATTS’ INSISTENCE ON PRACTICABILITY
While Watts laid the strongest emphasis on the awkwardness and
absurdity of much of the Psalm paraphrasing, he was also impressed
with the unavailability of the literary hymns of his predecessors, or
even of some of his own in his first book. The common people would not
sing them, they were out of their reach; moreover, they were not in
practicable meters and measures, and did not fit the accepted tunes
the people knew. Watts accepted the current Psalm version meters, Long
Meter, Common Meter, and Short Meter, and the Psalm tunes at once
became hymn tunes. It was quite a handicap to a literary hymn writer,
but essential to the practical use of the hymn.
Watts deliberately avoided distinctly literary quality in his hymns,
seeking only lucidity and plainness of expression, all within the
capacity of the common people. To quote from his prefaces, he
“endeavored to make the sense plain and obvious.... The metaphors are
generally sunk to the level of vulgar capacities.... Some of the
beauties of poesy are neglected and some wilfully defaced.”
Dr. Benson, whom it is always profitable to quote, says: “Watts’ work
earns a place in the literature of power, the literature that leaves
esthetic critics cold while it moves men.” Palgrave included nothing
of Watts in his _Golden Treasury_, but elsewhere speaks of him as “one
of those whose sacrifice of art to direct usefulness has probably lost
them those honors in literature to which they were entitled.”
VI. THE INESTIMABLE VALUE OF WATTS’ HYMNS
The offensive lines in Watts must be judged with due regard to their
background. The Sternhold and Hopkins version was vastly worse. It was
a time of dry doctrinal preaching and of a literal interpretation of
the Bible which to the preachers was largely a mere collection of
isolated proof texts. In these matters he was speaking in the idiom
and with the accent of his own generation. In the two centuries that
have since passed, the sand and gravel and debris have been washed
away, and our hymnals contain the pure gold of his verse for our
edification and delight. Outside of the hymnbooks of the Wesley
brothers, where can we find such a placer mine of spiritual wealth?
At his best Watts wrote hymns of majesty and ecstatic adoration that
have never been excelled:
“Our God, our Help in ages past,
Our Hope for years to come;
Our Shelter from the stormy blast,
And our eternal Home.”
How he has made the Long Meter measure sound like the great Open
Diapason of the pipe organ in the following lines!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account