The Singing Church: The Hymns It Wrote and SangLorenz, Edmund S. (Edmund Simon)
Religion
The Singing Church: The Hymns It Wrote and Sang
Lorenz, Edmund S. (Edmund Simon)
Hymns -- History and criticism
The inferiority of the popular hymnody became ever more pronounced as
the hymn was employed by heretical sects as a means of propagating
their pernicious doctrines. Bardesanes and his son Harmonius in
Edessa, Asia, a little later composed an entire psalter of one hundred
and fifty psalms, “deserting David’s truth and preserving David’s
numbers,” as Ephrem Syrus expressed it.
The Gnostic hymns during the third century were slowly undermining the
faith of the people, but it was not until Arius appeared with his
denial of the deity of Jesus Christ and spread broadcast his “Thalia,”
a collection of practical hymns emphasizing practical duties and the
value of the daily life of the people, as well as magnifying the
humanity of Jesus, that the full extent of the revolution in the
religious sentiment of the people became evident. He fitted his
measures to well-known popular tunes, sung only by those “who sing
songs over their wine with noise and revel.”
Arius, an ungainly giant of tremendous force of personality and
unbounded energy, thus began a movement that was to convulse with its
controversy the whole Roman Empire through many generations, even down
to our own times, and was to prepare Asia and Northern Africa for the
superimposition of the Mohammedan personality and cult upon an
emasculated Christianity.
In 269, Paul of Samosata, an Arian Bishop, banished from his churches
the hymns that had come down from the second century because they were
addressed to Christ as God and “as being innovations, the work of men
of later times.” He began the Arian fashion of propaganda by means of
hymns. As an answer to this came the great hymnic outburst of the
fourth century, headed by Gregory of Nazianzus and participated in by
St. Chrysostom.[3]
It is not surprising, therefore, that the Synod that met in Laodicea
in 363 ordered that “psalms composed by private men must not be read
in the church, nor uncanonical books, but only the canonical of the
New and Old Testament.”
Nor need we wonder that with the Arian fanatics interrupting orthodox
services by starting their heterodox hymns, the same Synod decided
that “beside the psalm singers appointed thereto who mount the ambo
and sing out of the book, no others shall sing in church.”
This robbing the lips and the hearts of the congregation of its share
of the public praise, in order to prevent Gnostic and Arian heretics
from profaning public services with their strife and contention,
hardened into a perpetual prohibition, and in the Greek church the
people are mute to this day.[4]
It should be remembered that these prohibitions applied only to public
services and their liturgies. Outside the walls of the larger churches
the people were still singing. Indeed, the popular song was used by
the orthodox to displace the heretical songs of the Arians, as was
done by Chrysostom in Constantinople, in order to stem the tide of
attack on the doctrine of the deity of Christ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account